HomeworkLib
Question

Explain whether discrimination against a person based on his/her sexual orientation is prohibited by Title VII....

  1. Explain whether discrimination against a person based on his/her sexual orientation is prohibited by Title VII. (Note: The assignment is to explain, not just to answer yes or no!).
business   Operations-Management   
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Next > < Previous
Sort answers by oldest

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Explanation:

Yes, discrimination against a person based on his/her sexual orientation is prohibited by Title VII. As per the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VIII, federal law prohibits employers to discriminate against employees based on their sexual orientation, race, religion, color, origin, ethnicity. EEOC give equal chances to all candidate apply for the job based on their qualifications. This law applies to companies where employees number is more than 15 and that includes federal and state governments also.

0 0
Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Explain whether discrimination against a person based on his/her sexual orientation is prohibited by Title VII....
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions

  • Same-gender sexual harassment: A. is excluded from Title VII protection because it is the same as...

    Same-gender sexual harassment: A. is excluded from Title VII protection because it is the same as affinity orientation discrimination. B. includes discrimination against transgenders. C. is prohibited by Title VII. D. is prohibited by Title VII only when the harassee and the harasser are strangers.

  • Case 1 Shane Dawson, a male homosexual, worked for Entek International. Some of Dawson’s co-workers, including his super...

    Case 1 Shane Dawson, a male homosexual, worked for Entek International. Some of Dawson’s co-workers, including his supervisor, made derogatory comments about his sexual orientation. Dawson’s work deteriorated. He filed a complaint with Entek’s human resources department. Two days later, he was fired. State law made it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an individual based on sexual orientation. [Dawson v. Entek International, 630 F.3d 928 (9th Cir. 2011)] (See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.) (523, Miller)...

  • Please answer all the Questions:) 26. Is Title VII violated by "same sex sexual harassment? (a) no; this is a legal impossibility (b) yes, but only if the harasser is homosexual (c) yes; it doesn...

    Please answer all the Questions:) 26. Is Title VII violated by "same sex sexual harassment? (a) no; this is a legal impossibility (b) yes, but only if the harasser is homosexual (c) yes; it doesn't matter what the sexes of the harasser and victim are as long as sexual harassment has in fact occurred (d) yes, but only in California The National Labor Relations Board will conduct a certification election if it is convinced that the union has the support...

  • Analyze whether Jimmy's Title VII religious discrimination suit against Simmons Corp. should be dismissed, using the...

    Analyze whether Jimmy's Title VII religious discrimination suit against Simmons Corp. should be dismissed, using the McDonnell Douglas test. See this document for a summary of the test. The McDonnell-Douglas Test for Intentional Discrimination Claims (1) Plaintiff must make a prima facie case of discrimination Prima facie case has 4 parts, all of which must be met by plaintiff: (1) Plaintiff is member of protected class (2) Plaintiff is qualified for the job in question (3) Plaintiff suffered an adverse...

  • QUESTION 1 After a discrimination charge is filed by the employee and notice of the charge...

    QUESTION 1 After a discrimination charge is filed by the employee and notice of the charge is given to the employer, the EEOC screens the charge to see if it is one that is appropriate for mediation. If it is appropriate for mediation, the EEOC will offer that option to the parties. In this case, each side has _____ days to respond to the offer to mediate. A. 30 B. 40 C. 10 D. 20 0.3 points    QUESTION 2...

  • "Workplace Discrimination and Civil Rights in the Workplace" Please respond to the following: Amanda Tucker, a...

    "Workplace Discrimination and Civil Rights in the Workplace" Please respond to the following: Amanda Tucker, a Hispanic female, applied for a sales position in Ames Department Stores in Seattle. After completing her application, she was asked to take a math test and a general aptitude test. As a result of her score, she was disqualified from consideration for the sales position. Based on this scenario, debate whether or not you believe that this testing policy is a violation of Title...

  • its 9-14, its not only 1 question!! thanks 4. In order to prevent discrimination against applicants...

    its 9-14, its not only 1 question!! thanks 4. In order to prevent discrimination against applicants of protected classes, your colleague decides to note the protected class characteristic of the applicants on their applications. What would be your advice to her? a. It's a good idea. Noting the protected class characteristic of the applicant on the application which make sure that the firm takes extra care not to discriminate against these applicants. b. It's NOT a good idea. Noting the...

  • QUESTION 1 Joe is a white male personal trainer at Buff Gym, a health club chain...

    QUESTION 1 Joe is a white male personal trainer at Buff Gym, a health club chain with over 100 employees. Joe was recently suspended from his job for arguing with a client while on the gym floor. Bob is a black male personal trainer at Buff Gym who recently shoved a client while on the gym floor. Bob was not disciplined. In this case: A. Joe has a Title VII racial discrimination claim for disparate treatment. B. Joe does not...

  • 31. Wod Chemical excludes black males from certain jobs at its plant, indicating that exposure to...

    31. Wod Chemical excludes black males from certain jobs at its plant, indicating that exposure to one of its chemicals used there has been linked to sickle cell anemia, a disease to which African American men are particularly susceptible. When sued for employment discrimination, Wow may successfully invoke the BFOQ defense. (T/F) 32. Brandy, a middle manager who is a lesbian, tells Martina, a heterosexual, that she will not get a well-deserved raise unless she has sex with her. Martina...

  • One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,...

    One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).  This case basically established what the burden of proof must be in order for someone to prove discrimination. Like most lawsuits, this case started out with a disgruntled employee, Percy Green. Mr. Green claimed that his employer, McDonnel-Douglas, had discriminated against him based on his race. This assignment will take you through the long legal history of this case. Don’t worry...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT