Question

Wind farms usually function as one component of a larger energy generation and
distribution system. As engineers seek to design power grids that draw larger
percentages of the total power available from renewable sources, they must
consider not only ?uctuations in the availability of individual renewable resources
such as solar energy, wind, and water power, but also whether the same weather
conditions might a?ect the availability of several di?erent resources. An e?cient
system will include renewable components that complement each other, and
avoid those that, as a result of design or location, tend to produce energy
surpluses or de?cits under similar conditions. This is particularly true in the Paci?c
Northwest, where the grid is already heavily dependent on hydroelectric power.
As Cross, Kohfeld, Bailey, and Cooper (2015) point out, “wind farms with aboveaverage
generation during low in?ow periods would have greater value than
otherwise similar sites where most generation occurs during periods of high
in?ows and reservoir levels when electricity prices are typically lower” (p. 2). Such
an arrangement would avoid the wasteful scenario seen in Washington State in
2011, when an extended period of rain resulted not only in accumulation of more
water than reservoirs could hold, but also in a need to create ?nancial incentives
to decrease the production of wind energy in order to keep production and prices
relatively stable.
References
Cross, B.D., Kohfeld, K.E., Bailey, J., & Cooper

Answer 1

Here in the article it has been shown that-

As architects look to configuration power frameworks that draw bigger rates of the absolute force accessible from inexhaustible sources, they should consider not just uctuations in the accessibility of individual sustainable assets, for example, sun oriented vitality, wind, and water power, yet additionally whether a similar climate conditions may an ect the accessibility of a few di erent assets.

An e cient framework will incorporate inexhaustible parts that supplement one another, and keep away from those that, because of plan or area, will in general produce vitality surpluses or de cits under comparative conditions.

As Cross, Kohfeld, Bailey, and Cooper point out, "wind ranches with aboveaverage age during low in ow periods would have more prominent incentive than in any case comparative locales where most age happens during times of high in ows and store levels when power costs are ordinarily lower.

Wind cultivates generally work as one segment of a bigger vitality age and circulation framework.

This is especially valid in the Paci c Northwest, where the network is as of now intensely reliant on hydroelectric force.

Thanks