Question

In a cap-and-trade program, as polluters buy and sell permits, they move to a situation where...

In a cap-and-trade program, as polluters buy and sell permits, they move to a situation where

Select one:

a. all firms’ marginal abatement costs are equal to the price of the permits

b. the total amount spent on permits is less than the total amount spent on abatement

c. total abatement costs are equal to the total amount spent on permits

d. the demand for permits will exceed the supply

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

In cap and trade government decide the pollution level and decide how many permits to allocate. Polluters trade permit to pollute. the firm which can abate pollution with lower cost sell permit to the firm who need it. Polluters buy permit when the cost of permit less than abatement cost so that they can gain some revenue. Therefore option b is correct.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
In a cap-and-trade program, as polluters buy and sell permits, they move to a situation where...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Please answer all three. 7. The EPA's CAP program for SO2 gave producers an incentive to look for cheaper ways of lowering emissions becausc A. an emissions rate was mandated for firms and the pen...

    Please answer all three. 7. The EPA's CAP program for SO2 gave producers an incentive to look for cheaper ways of lowering emissions becausc A. an emissions rate was mandated for firms and the penalties were high B. increasing scarcity of permits drove their price up C. offset trading offered large trade gains D. emissions taxes were enforced with vigor 8. In a cap-and-trade program, as polluters buy and sell permits, they move to a situation wherc A. all firms'...

  • a region that must reduce emissions, three polluters currently emit 30 units of emissions. The three...

    a region that must reduce emissions, three polluters currently emit 30 units of emissions. The three firms have the following marginal abatement cost (MAC) functions that describe how marginal costs vary with the amount of emissions each firm reduces Firm Emissions Firm MAC $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00 $4.50 $5.00 $5.50 Firm 2 MAC $1.00 $%2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 $10.00 Firm 3 MAC Reduction $%2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 $10.00 $11.00...

  • Joulutet 3. Assume that a firm has the following marginal benefit of pollution (denoted E for...

    Joulutet 3. Assume that a firm has the following marginal benefit of pollution (denoted E for emissions, measured in tons): MB=150-5 E e. Now assume that instead the government allocates each firm permits to pollute equal to the total current pollution minus 12 tons, but allows the firms to trade. Which firm will purchase permits and which firm will sell permits? Hint: Notice that total pollution reduction of firm 1 plus firm 2 will be 24 tons. f. How much...

  • Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1=12 -...

    Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1=12 - 2E1 MAC2 =10 - E2 Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 1/2 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint:...

  • Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1 =12−2E1MAC2...

    Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1 =12−2E1MAC2 =10−E2. Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 12 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint: This will be a...

  • Suppose there are two firms and they pollute the environment. Their total abatement cost is given...

    Suppose there are two firms and they pollute the environment. Their total abatement cost is given below.   TC(R1)=1/2(R1)^2, TC(R2)=2/3(R2)^3/2 Suppose the government wants to reduce pollution by 12 units. 6. Now suppose that firms are allowed to sell and buy pollution permits from each other. In the absence of any permits, they need to reduce pollution by 6 units each. If the price of pollution permits is $2, how many pollution permits would Firm 1 buy? 7.Now suppose that firms...

  • Q.4. (45 Points) Suppose that under the Michigan’s voluntary emission trading program, the object...

    Q.4. (45 Points) Suppose that under the Michigan’s voluntary emission trading program, the objective for the two major firms in an urban area is a 50 percent reduction in carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from 120 units to 60 units. Each firm face the following costs: Firm 1: TAC1=2000+0.6(A1) 2 MAC1=1.2A1 Firm 2: TAC2=1000+0.2(A2) 2 MAC2=0.4A2, where A1 and A2 represent the percentages of CO emission abatement achieved by Firm 1 and Firm 2, respectively, and TAC and MAC are measured...

  • Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits

    Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods:Available Methods to Reduce Pollution1.The government sets pollution standards using regulation.2.The government allocates tradable pollution permits.Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult...

  • Assume that a firm has the following marginal benefit of pollution (denoted E for emissions, measured...

    Assume that a firm has the following marginal benefit of pollution (denoted E for emissions, measured in tons): MB=150-5E Q: How much would this firm pollute if pollution is unregulated? The government would like to reduce pollution from this amount by 12 tons and so implements a quantity constraint at the quantity in part (a) minus 12. What is the cost to this firm of reducing pollution by 12 tons? What tax would encourage this polluter to reduce pollution by...

  • This is a 5 part question Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose...

    This is a 5 part question Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT