Question

Hello I need the following 20 multiple choice questions answered please

Jennifer took a video recording of Jack and Alice fighting in an alley. Jack and Alice disclose multiple private facts about each other through the course of the argument. Jennifer posts the fight on the internet. Which of the following is true?

Jack and Alice can make a tort claim against Jennifer for false light. Jack and Alice can take no action, because Jennifer is not a professional videographer. Jack and Alice can make a tort claim against Jennifer for public revelation of private facts. Jack and Alice can take no action, since they were fighting in a public place.

• Bookmark question for later

  Amanda is babysitting when her charge Tomas leaps off a couch onto a glass table and breaks it, leaving him with many cuts. To show that Amanda was negligent, Tomas’s parents must show that:

  Amanda owed a duty of care to Tomas Amanda breached her duty of watching over Tomas by her actions (e.g., talking on the phone or not staying in the same room as Tomas) Tomas was harmed only because Amanda breached her duty to watch over him All of the above

• Bookmark question for later

  What type of crime is petty theft?

  Infraction Capital Crime Misdemeanor Felony

• Bookmark question for later

  NuKere, a nuclear plant, accidently leaks hazardous waste onto a nearby property, despite having recently passed a rigorous set of safety checks. Under standards of strict liability, which of the following is true?

  Nukere should be held liable because of the dangerous nature of hazardous waste. Regardless of safety checks, the accident happened. NuKere cannot be held liable, as it just passed a strict set of safety checks. Nukere cannot be held liable because anyone living nearby assumes the risk of hazardous waste toxicity. NuKere can be held liable only if there is concrete physical evidence of harm to people or property.

• Bookmark question for later

  Penny is seen organizing racks at a local clothing store one day while she shops, and the manager offers her a job. The next day, Penny’s boss from the clothing store across the street comes in and accuses the manager of trying to interfere with Penny’s non-competition agreement. Which of the following is true?

  The manager has done nothing wrong because non-competition agreements are never used in clothing retail. The manager has committed legitimate interference with a contractual relationship The manager is interfering with Penny’s business relationship with her boss. The manager has done nothing wrong.

• Bookmark question for later

  Jesse’s mother dies. Due to the trauma, Jesse breaks into an ice cream shop, steals all the ice cream, and is later caught. Which defense most likely applies to this situation? (Whether or not the defense will work is not relevant.)

  Mistake of Law Diminished Capacity Entrapment

• Bookmark question for later

  Eduardo is working his way up the ladder in the world of amateur boxing. He makes a stinging remark about his next opponent on TV by saying that his opponent is a coward who probably practices boxing by beating up his wife. Which of the following is true?

  Eduardo is not being defamatory because his remarks are statements of opinion only. Eduardo is not being defamatory because it is obvious that the statement must be false. Eduardo is being defamatory because the information he published is true. Eduardo is being defamatory because his remarks may harm his opponent’s reputation.

• Bookmark question for later

  Which of the following situations would not substantiate a tort claim of infliction of emotional distress?

  Repetitive offensive behavior Offensive behavior when a duty of care is owed Behavior that a reasonable person would find distasteful Offensive behavior when a person is feeling especially vulnerable

• Bookmark question for later

  While on a hike with a tour group in the mountains, Derek gets mauled by a bear. No previous reports of bears in the area had been made. Derek wants to hold the tour company liable for his injury. Which of the following is most likely true?

  Because hiking is known to have some elements of danger, Derek assumed the risk of a bear attack by joining the tour group. Derek cannot hold the tour company liable because there is no way to prepare for or avoid a bear attack. Because most people would not expect something as dangerous as a bear encounter while on a hike, an assumption of risk defense will probably not protect the tour company. The company is not at fault because it does not owe Derek a duty of care.

• Bookmark question for later

  What type of crime is money laundering?

  Capital Crime Infraction Felony Misdemeanor

• Bookmark question for later

  Rebekah unknowingly grows illegal marijuana plants in her garden, assuming they are just weeds. If Rebekah is discovered growing the marijuana, strict liability would infer that:

  Rebekah is liable only if she was found to be negligent in not recognizing the marijuana Rebekah is not liable if someone else was witnessed planting the marijuana Rebekah is not liable because she had no illegal intent Rebekah is liable even though she had no illegal intent

• Bookmark question for later

  Which crime is BEST represented by the following situation?

  Dagan sneaks into an event center through an unlocked window to steal valuable items on display for an event the next day.

  Conspiracy Larceny Burglary Fraud

• Bookmark question for later

  Elaine is a secretary for a business. One day a customer comes in to file a new contract while Elaine is seated at her boss’s desk. The customer assumes Elaine is a person of authority, and Elaine is knowledgeable enough to help the customer file the contract. Which response aligns best with this situation?

  Enforceable via factor agent Enforceable via employee agent Enforceable or unenforceable with agency Enforceable or unenforceable—no agency

• Bookmark question for later

  Which statement corresponds to this specific situation?

  Rowan owns a computer programming business with 15 employees. He is hiring a new employee, and he turns down a 45-year-old man because he is “too old to keep up with the rest of the group.”

  Employer may legally discriminate because the law doesn't apply to this situation Employer may not legally discriminate Employer may legally discriminate based on number of employees Employer may legally discriminate based on BFOQ

• Bookmark question for later

  Which statement matches the following scenario?

  Joy is a supervisor over Elias. She repeatedly solicits sexual behavior from Elias and does other inappropriate actions that a reasonable person would find offensive. Elias has not solicited the behavior and finds it unwelcome. Joy never imposes a tangible job action against Elias.

  Not guilty of sexual harassment, dependent on harassee Not guilty of sexual harassment, no qualifier Guilty of quid pro quo sexual harassment Guilty of hostile work environment sexual harassment

• Bookmark question for later

  Felipe is an illegal immigrant seeking work in the U.S. He is hired by a small factory doing manual labor. When it is discovered that Felipe is an illegal immigrant:

  Felipe can be deported, and the employer can be punished. Felipe cannot be deported, and the employer will not be punished. Felipe can be deported, and the employer will not be punished. Felipe cannot be deported, but the employer can be punished.

• Bookmark question for later

  Phineas is an agent assigned to scout out professional players for a football team. One player he brings in has a drug problem, which Phineas knows about but does not disclose to the hiring team. If the player is selected, which of the following is true?

  Phineas has breached his duty of accounting only. Phineas has breached his duty of notification only. Phineas has not breached a duty to his principal. Phineas has breached more than one of his duties.

• Bookmark question for later

  Megan’s boss is out of town. While she is gone, the company receives a critical tax bill from the state that must be paid immediately. Megan does not have authority to pay bills, but arranges for the company to pay the bill anyway. Which response best first the situation?

  Enforceable or unenforceable with agency Enforceable via factor agent Enforceable or unenforceable—no agency Enforceable via employee agent

• Bookmark question for later

  Kenzie is a broker agent hired to make a deal for the purchase of an office building. Kenzie sells the building.

  What is the result related to the status of the agency?

  Agency is terminated by law Agency is terminated by fulfillment Agency is terminated by incapacity Agency is not terminated

• Bookmark question for later

  Mike is an agent making purchasing orders for Tami. Tami passes away before the agency contract is voluntarily ended. Mike has already done some of the work Tami assigned.

  What is the result related to the status of the agency?

  Agency is terminated by law Agency is terminated by fulfillment Agency is terminated by incapacity Agency is not terminated

Answer 1

1st question

correct answer is Jack and Alice can make a tort claim against Jennifer for public revelation of private facts

2nd question

Correct answer is Amanda breached her duty of watching over Tomas by her actions (e.g., talking on the phone or not staying in the same room as Tomas)

In order to show Amanda was negligent, it is needed to show that Amanda breached her duty of watching over Tomas by her actions (e.g., talking on the phone or not staying in the same room as Tomas)

3rd question

Correct answer is Misdemeanor

petty theft is Misdemeanor

4th question

Correct answer is Nukere should be held liable because of the dangerous nature of hazardous waste. Regardless of safety checks, the accident happened.

Under standards of strict liability, Nukere should be held liable because of the dangerous nature of hazardous waste. Regardless of safety checks, the accident happened.