Two firms in a regional shipping industry, Albatross, Inc. and Barracuda LTD, both emit carbon in their transportation activities. Albatross emits 40 tons annually and can abate carbon emission at $100 per ton. Barracuda also emits 40 tons annually and can abate at $200/ton. The regional EPA wants to reduce carbon emissions between these two firms to 60 tons total annually, so it issues 30 permits to each firm. Assume for now that the firms cannot trade, exchange or otherwise buy or sell these permits. They are nontransferable. Calculate how much it costs each firm to abate to meet the standard and how much it abates and emits.
Select one:
a. Albatross emits 20 tons and abates 20 tons for a cost of $2000. Barracuda does not abate anything (cost = $0) and emits 40 tons.
b. Each firm emits 30 tons and abates the remaining 10 tons. The abatement cost to Albatross is $2000, and to Barracuda it is $1000.
c. Each firm emits 30 tons and abates the remaining 10 tons. The abatement cost to Albatross is $1000, and to Barracuda it is $2000.
d. Barracuda emits 20 tons and abates 20 tons for a cost of $4000. Albatross does not abate anything (cost = $0) and emits 40 tons.
Since, both the firms cannot sell or trade or exchange permits, each firm has to compulsorily abate 10 tons of excess emissions for which they do not possess the permits.
Each firm can emit only 30 tons according to the number of permits they possess and hence have to abate 10 tons each
Cost of abating 10 tons of emissions for Albatross = $100 x 10 = $1,000
Cost of abating 10 tons of emissions for Barracuda = $200 x 10 = $2,000
Ans: c. Each firm emits 30 tons and abates the remaining 10 tons. The abatement cost to Albatross is $1000, and to Barracuda it is $2000.
Two firms in a regional shipping industry, Albatross, Inc. and Barracuda LTD, both emit carbon in...
Eeon 5:48: Homework 10 Names 1. Two manufacturers in the town of Gamecock emit a total of 40 tons (20 tons each) of a harmful toxin. The local government wants to limit the total pollution to 20 tons since health studies find no serious deleterious impacts on human health at these levels of pollution. Firm A's marginal cost of abatement is 5X and Firm B's marginal cost of abatement is 2x where X and Xare the tons of toxin abated...
5. Suppose that there is an industry with two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost curves as follows MAC1 1,000 2E1 MAC2 500 E2 E1 and E2 represent the respective emissions of each firm in tonnes [3] (a) Solve for initial emissions for each fim and rewrite both of the MAC equations as functions of abatement [6] (b) Derive the Industry MAC curve for this industry . Briefly explain each of the steps you take to find the...
13. The marginal benefit of being able to emit a ton of sulfur dioxide emissions for two firms are given by: MBx 200 (Ex /2) MBy-300-(Ey3) Note that these marginal benefit figures can be interpreted as marginal cost of abating emission down to levels Ex and Ey Government regulators want to reduce total sulfur dioxide emissions to a total of 1000 tons If the government imposes the same standard of 500 tons maximum emissions on both firms what would be...
A carbon emission tax is increasingly recommended a policy to address člimate change Under a carbon tax, emitters can discharge carbon into the atmosphere as long as they pay the government a tax for every unit of carbon released (typically defined as a tor) Suppose is discharger is releasing 20 tons of carbon. The marginal cost of reducing carbon (the cost to abate the incremental ton) is shown in the table below. If the government imposed a $20/ton emission tax,...
Suppose that two firms, X and Y, face the following abatement costs: MACX = 1.2AX, MACY = 0.3AY TACX = 0.6AX2 TACY = 0.15AY2 Further assume that the combined abatement standard is 40 units for both firms. Based on the model given, the cost-effective solution would arise if each firm abates 20 units of pollution firm X abates 8 units, and firm Y abates 32 units firm Y does all the abating because its MAC is lower firm X abates 24...
he following table contains information on the marginal abatement costs of four firms, related to the quantity of emissions. Currently, Firm 1 emits 40 tons/week, Firm 2 emits 35 tons/week, Firm 3 emits 30 tons/week, and Firm 4 emits 25 tons/week. Thus, total emissions are 130 tons/week. Suppose the government wishes to reduce total emissions to 60 tons/week. Emissions 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MAC Firm 1 ($/ton) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7...
There are two firms producing cement. Each produces 20 units of pollution, and each has the ability to reduce pollution (abate) their emissions by operating some machine. The marginal damage of each unit of pollution to society is $3 (i.e., the marginal benefit of each unit of abatement is $3). The total cost of firm 1 is where denotes the amount of abatement of firm 1. The total cost of firm 2 is where denotes the amount of abatement of...
Two thermic power plants have the following marginal and total cost of abatement of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. When faced with no restrictions each of them emits maximum 100 ppm (parts per million) of NOx. Firm 1: MAC1=5 A1 TAC1=2.5 (A1)^2 Firm 2: MAC2 = 10 A2 TAC2= 5(A2)^2 (8 pts) The EPA finds the total NOx emissions of 200 ppm too much and seeks for improvement in air quality by specifying the reduction of 40% in total emissions from...
There are two factories in a small town. Both of them emit carbon dioxide into the air. Factory 1 currently emits 120 tons per month, whereas factory 2 currently emits 160 tons per month. The technology of each factory is different, so their costs of reducing emissions are different as well. The tables below show the costs of reducing emissions in increments of 20 tons per month for each factory: Factory 1 Total cost of reducing emissions by 20 tons/month...
In the following table are the marginal abatement costs of two firms. Note that an entry in the table indicates the cost of reducing emissions by one unit from the previous level. For example, $300 is the additional abatement cost for firm 1 to reduce its emissions from 3 tons to 2 tons, and $40 is the cost for firm 2 to reduce its emissions from 7 tons to 6 tons. Suppose that the Environmental Protection Agency wants to reduce...