Europeans have been more skeptical than Americans about the use
of genetic engineering to improve foods. A sample survey gathered
responses from random samples of 855 Americans and 12362 Europeans.
(The European sample was larger because Europe is divided into many
nations.) Subjects were asked to consider the following
issue:
Using modern biotechnology in the production of foods, for
example to make them higher in protein, keep longer, or change in
taste.
They were asked if they considered this "risky for society." In
all, 430 of Americans and 7638 of Europeans thought the application
was risky.
Give a 99% confidence interval for the percent difference (±0.1)
between Europe (call them group 1) and the United States:
± %.
Here, , n1 = 12362 , n2 = 855
p1cap = 0.6179 , p2cap = 0.5029
Standard Error, sigma(p1cap - p2cap),
SE = sqrt(p1cap * (1-p1cap)/n1 + p2cap * (1-p2cap)/n2)
SE = sqrt(0.6179 * (1-0.6179)/12362 + 0.5029*(1-0.5029)/855)
SE = 0.0176
For 0.99 CI, z-value = 2.58
CI = (p1cap - p2cap +/- ME
= (0.6179 - 0.5029) +/- 2.58 * 0.0176
= 0.115 +/- 0.0454
= 11.5% +/- 4.54%
Europeans have been more skeptical than Americans about the use of genetic engineering to improve foods....
Please read the article bellow and discuss the shift in the
company's approach to genetic analysis. Please also discuss what
you think about personal genomic companies' approaches to research.
Feel free to compare 23andMe's polices on research with another
company's. Did you think the FDA was right in prohibiting 23andMe
from providing health information?
These are some sample talking points to get you thinking about
the ethics of genetic research in the context of Big Data. You
don't have to...