A project owner issues a Design-Bid-Build contract to construct
a shopping center. The contractor makes several sub-contract
agreements with different specialty contractors. The contractor
fails to pay several subcontractors for their work. The
subcontractors sue the owner because they have not been paid. a. Is
the owner liable to the subcontractors for breach of contract? Why
or why not? b. If the owner is not liable do the subcontractor's
have any ability to recover their claims against the owner?
answer-
a- No the owner is no liable to the sub contractors for the breach of the contract because owner has contract with general contract only he can can be responsible for general contractor not for sub contractors.this is based on The doctrine of privity of contract is a common law principle which provides that a contract cannot confer rights or impose obligations upon any person who is not a party to the contract. The premise is that only parties to contracts should be able to sue to enforce their rights or claim damages as such .
in this contract, general contractor and sub contractor has the contract so they are the parties on owner.
b- they can recover if they can file mechanic's lien A subcontractor who has done work, with the knowledge and consent of the client, may file a mechanic's lien, the same way that a general contractor can. The presence of subcontractors on the work site should not be a secret. Owners should be aware that subcontractors have been hired to perform some of the work.
otherwise, there is no way that sub contractors can recover claim against the owner like if owner does not know about sub contractor or has no contact then general contractor will pay.
A project owner issues a Design-Bid-Build contract to construct a shopping center. The contractor makes several...
Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been entered into between the libelants and the appellant corporation on the 22d day of May, 1900, at Pyramid Harbor, Alaska, by which it is claimed the appellant promised to pay each of the libelants, among other things, the sum of $100 for services rendered and to be rendered....
Please see attached Pictures. This is a homework assignment for
Legal environment of Business that i need help solving.
Stacy mails Jennifer an offer to sell Jennifer 43 bags of rice for $107.00. Jennifer replies to Stacy by mail, stating, " agree to pay $105.75 for 43 bags of rice. Neither Stacy nor Jennifer are merchants. What is the status of Stacy's offer. 1. a. Jennifer has accepted it b. Jenifer has rejected it and counteroffered c, Jennifer has breached...
Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...