According to Kant, in order to act morally one must
A. act according to the categorical imperative
B. act according to the categorical imperative and with the right motive
C. act with the right motive
D. act according to a hypothetical imperative and with the right motive
The correct answer is Option B. According to Kant, one must act according to the categorical imperative and with the right motive.
According to Kant, in order to act morally one must A. act according to the categorical...
The imperative of morality is: a. prudential. b. categorical. c. analytic . d. hypothetical. According to Kant, a. It is impossible to get out of hypothetical imperatives. b. Hypothetical imperatives guide all our moral action. c. Hypothetical imperatives are the foundation for categorical imperatives. d. None of these For Kant, the results of an action are not as important as its motive but still need to be considered. True False
1. Which one of the following is NOT a version of the categorical imperative discussed by Kant? A) Always act so that you treat a person not only as an end but also as means. B) Always act so that the rule governing your act can be willed to be universal moral law. C) Persons as rational ends in themselves are the makers of universal moral law. D) Each of the following is a version of the categorical imperative discussed...
According to Kant, when two rules conflict with each other (to act according to one means violating the other), we should: a) Act according to the one that is most consistent with not creating a bigger problem. b) Act according to the rule that is consistent with the divine command. c) Act according to whichever rule covers more situations--even ones not like this. d) None of these.
Kant formulates two versions of his categorical imperative, though he claims they are merely different formulations of the same principle. Would it be possible for someone to consistently hold the first imperative (always act in such a way that you could will that your act should be a universal law) but deny the second imperative (always treat others as ends in themselves, and never merely as means)?
Kantianism is one of the ethical theories proposed by Immanuel Kant. Kant explained his theory using two formulation for Categorical Imperative. On your own words, explain each Formulation and give a simple scenario for each Formulation to illustrate their definitions. kindly i need answer in a text
i need help explain Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative. In your answer you must include the principle's 3 steps for moral duty and provide one example to test through the Categorical Imperative. How does self-contradiction play a role in Kant's Categorical Imperative? How do the principle and test derive immoral and moral actions? Next, explain Immanuel Kant's Practical Imperative as well as its primary ethical standard. In addition, you need to distinguish between an end and a meansand explain the difference...
According to Aristotle, which condition below must be obtained in order to act virtuously? a. the doer must act from a fixed and unchangeable disposition b. the act must be prescribed by law c. the doer must follow his bliss d. the agent must act in full consciousness of what others have done
Physilophy question 9. Hobbes’ psychological egoism denies the existence of altruism because we will just do what is morally right for our pleasure. T F 10 is simply the rule that we should always try to achieve the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people. a. Kantianism b. Utilitarianism c. Egoism d. None of the above. 11. The principle: “Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it...
According to Aristotle, in order to act virtuously, one must become a virtuous person. How does Aristotle claim we can achieve this virtuous character? Explain your answer in 200 words. Include links if outside sources are used.
Kant asserts that we view the world through our own perception and that morality is objective and based on reason. The types of knowledge we can have is a priori, knowledge independent of experience, and a posteriori, knowledge we can only have after certain experiences. A priori knowledge can provide knowledge of the noumenal world, while a posteriori knowledge gives us knowledge of the phenomenal world. According to Kant, we can make theoretical or practical judgements. Theoretical judgements are concerned...