Question

Discuss the difference in effect of the following clauses:    - “This document does not give...

Discuss the difference in effect of the following clauses:
  
- “This document does not give rise to any legal relationship and shall not be subject to legal jurisdiction in the law courts.”
- “No court shall have power or jurisdiction to arbitrate in respect of any matter arising out of this agreement or any breach thereof.”
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

a) The court has the duty to listen and determine matters which are within its jurisdiction it should therefore determine matters that it has the authority and the powers to determine. In the event that a document does not give rise to a legal jurisdiction then it cannot be considered by courts in its hearing and determination

b)When the document shows that the court cannot hear and determine a matter arising from the court, the specific clause which states that the court cannot determine any matter that has been barred from the agreement. In addition to that there is issue of having the matter that is determined by the courts despite the clause barring it being declared a mistrial and being declared null and void.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Discuss the difference in effect of the following clauses:    - “This document does not give...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • The Case of Cooter’s Alternative Dispute Resolution                 Cooters Restaurant used an alternative dispute resolution program....

    The Case of Cooter’s Alternative Dispute Resolution                 Cooters Restaurant used an alternative dispute resolution program. Employees of Cooters had to sign an “agreement to arbitrate employment-related disputes” to be eligible for raises, transfers, and promotions. Under the agreement, both Cooters and the employee agreed to resolve all disputes arising out of employment, including “any claim of discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation, or wrongful discharge, whether arising under federal or state law,” through arbitration.             In a separate policy document not...

  • affidavit A voluntary written statement sworn to before an authorized official arraignment An appearance in court...

    affidavit A voluntary written statement sworn to before an authorized official arraignment An appearance in court prior to a criminal trial. Often the identity of the defendant is established, the defendant is informed of the charges and of his or her rights, and the defendant is required to enter a plea defendant A person accused of a crime against whom legal action is brought deposition A statement made under oath outside of court that is intended to be used as...

  • The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...

    The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...

  • Article (Reuters) - Macy’s Inc is suing Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc, accusing the company of...

    Article (Reuters) - Macy’s Inc is suing Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc, accusing the company of breach of contract for entering into an agreement to sell certain products at stores run by its rival J.C. Penney Co Inc. Martha Stewart attends the Chado Ralph Rucci Spring 2010 collection during New York Fashion Week, September 12, 2009. The operator of Macy’s department stores says Martha Stewart Living granted it the exclusive right to manufacture and sell certain products under a 2006...

  • How does confidential business information maintain the protection of the law?                   a. by registration        &nbsp

    How does confidential business information maintain the protection of the law?                   a. by registration                       b. by fixation                    c. by efforts to keep it secret        d. by use The president of Amanda's organization has instructed that all strategic business information be protected due to its confidentiality. How will this secret information receive protection? a. Protection is afforded exclusively through patent claims. Protection is afforded exclusively through express or implied confidentiality obligations. Protection is afforded by copyright law. Protection is...

  • Read this New York Times article linked on the assignment page and share your thoughts. Failed...

    Read this New York Times article linked on the assignment page and share your thoughts. Failed by Law and Courts, Troops Come Home to Repossessions By JESSICA SILVER-GREENBERG and MICHAEL CORKERY MARCH 16, 2015 Charles Beard, a sergeant in the Army National Guard, says he was on duty in the Iraqi city of Tikrit when men came to his California home to repossess the family car. Unless his wife handed over the keys, she would go to jail, they said....

  • TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page...

    TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page 12 of volume 4 of the Revised Code of Washington, part 20. ___2. The United States Congress has adopted one particular approach to ethics, and made it a part of the United States Code; all United States businesses must follow only those statutes in the United States Code, and are not allowed to determine what their businesses’ approaches to ethics will be. ___3. An...

  • Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are...

    Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are the facts of this case? What is the issue? 2. In what court was it decided, and how did it get to that court? 3. What did the court below decide, and why? What did this court decide, and why? 4. What does it mean to be "affected with the public interest"? 5. What is the significance of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S....

  • Question: What does Hobbes suggest is the reason we have government at all? How does Locke’s...

    Question: What does Hobbes suggest is the reason we have government at all? How does Locke’s view of the need for government differ? Using these sources: From Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan book 1, chapter 13 So that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel. First, competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory. The first maketh men invade for gain; the second, for safety; and the third, for reputation. The first use violence, to make themselves masters of other...

  • Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been...

    Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been entered into between the libelants and the appellant corporation on the 22d day of May, 1900, at Pyramid Harbor, Alaska, by which it is claimed the appellant promised to pay each of the libelants, among other things, the sum of $100 for services rendered and to be rendered....

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT