Thirty-six students at a local middle school were randomly selected to participate in a taste test to select a new menu item for a cafeteria. Each student was given a choice between the macaroni and cheese and the Cajun potato barrels. From the sample, 20 students selected macaroni and cheese and 16 students chose the Cajun potato barrels. Each student was asked to rate the item they chose on a scale from 1 (extremely dislike) to 9 (extremely like). Which of the following prevents this study from being a well-designed experiment?
A)There was no replication because students did not eat both menu items.
B)The treatments (new menu item) were not randomly assigned to the students.
C)An item that is currently on the menu should have been used as a control.
D)Students should not have been randomly selected.
E)There were no problems, and the study was a well-designed experiment.
Each student was given a choice between the macaroni and cheese and the Cajun potato barrels. So, The treatments were not randomly assigned to the students and students who prefer their food will select that irem and give high ratings. So, the study suffers from selection bias.
Below prevents this study from being a well-designed experiment
B)The treatments (new menu item) were not randomly assigned to the students.
Thirty-six students at a local middle school were randomly selected to participate in a taste test...
Students at a local middle school were randomly selected to participate in a reading comprehension program. The program is designed to increase their reading comprehension. A total of 21 students each took a pretest before the program and posttest after the program. The mean differences in the posttest and pretest is 24. The administration decided that all students in the school would participate in the program next school year. Let µA denote the mean score of the posttest and µB...
The investigators administered the study questionnaire by telephone from March 15-23. Students selected for participation were called at their dormitory room or their home telephone number as recorded in university records. If the student was not present at either location but information on his/her whereabouts was available, additional phone calls were made to contact the student. Students not reached during spring break were interviewed on their return to the university. Thirty-six cases and 144 controls were contacted. Cases included in...
The investigators administered the study questionnaire by
telephone from March 15-23. Students selected for participation
were called at their dormitory room or their home telephone number
as recorded in university records. If the student was not present
at either location but information on his/her whereabouts was
available, additional phone calls were made to contact the student.
Students not reached during spring break were interviewed on their
return to the university.
Thirty-six cases and 144 controls were contacted. Cases included
in...