A presidential candidate had a history of being pro-choice, believing that it is a woman’s right to choose abortion over birth (within certain limits). A decade later, however, the candidate declared himself to be pro-life, arguing that life should be protected, first and foremost. The politician attributes his new view to witnessing the pain and stress of an abortion-related decision by a friend. What does the candidate’s history with this issue confirm about the nature of his beliefs?
|
That they are not necessarily based on logic or fact. |
||
|
They can be influenced by what he experiences. |
||
|
They can be changed but such change can take a long time or strong evidence. |
||
|
All of the above |
||
|
None of the above |
All of the above.
Why?
Option A because the change is his views is not based on some fact or evidence or logic which brings us to option B where he experiences a certain situation which influenced his choice, the situation of his friend. Option C also because it took some strong personal evidence for the candidate to change his stance on the matter.
A presidential candidate had a history of being pro-choice, believing that it is a woman’s right...
Industrial-organizational psychologists are interested in all of the following except1. how to best diagnose clinical disorders and offer therapy to employees.2. how personality characteristics influence work behavior.3. how culture influences people's perceptions of their working environments.4. how people's work affects their home life.An organizational psychologist would be most likely concerned with1. studying the interaction between humans and technology.2. All of the these3. interviewing potential employees.4. helping people organize their schedules and daily planners.5. understanding the emotional and motivational side of...