Question

We most often think of the U.S. Supreme Court as a legal body, but it is...

We most often think of the U.S. Supreme Court as a legal body, but it is also a political body in many ways. Discuss the role of politics and ideology in judicial decision-making.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Any official in government organizations would be appointed by people or political party that rules that country. This would mean that people in most of the high official posts such as, military heads, research heads, judicial heads etc. are not selected but appointed by those in power after considering whether those who are selected would support the political ideology or not. These people would always strive hard to fulfill the policies and decisions taken by the ruling party. Thus, it’s not just administrative decision but also political that would differ depending on the party in power.

Thank you for your question. Please rate if you like the answer.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
We most often think of the U.S. Supreme Court as a legal body, but it is...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • What is the most significant role the United States Supreme Court plays in the American legal...

    What is the most significant role the United States Supreme Court plays in the American legal system and why do you think they are still so important to the United States government?

  • In Dartmouth College v. Woodward, decided Feb. 2, 1819, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the legal...

    In Dartmouth College v. Woodward, decided Feb. 2, 1819, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the legal personhood of corporations as an essential principle of American law. In a decision by Chief Justice John Marshall, the court found for the school over the state of New Hampshire's takeover. According to Marshall, the court was duty-bound to defend the college's independence because its corporate charter was protected by the Constitution's prohibition on state laws "impairing the obligation of contracts." Dartmouth as an...

  • In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton argued that the judiciary was the least dangerous branch of...

    In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton argued that the judiciary was the least dangerous branch of government. Many people would argue that Hamilton was incorrect and that today's courts wield an enormous amount of power. However, Hamilton believed the courts were the least dangerous branch because they had the power of neither the purse nor the sword. The courts' power increased with John Marshall's establishment of judicial review. All presidents are concerned with the legacy they leave once out of...

  • The U.S. Supreme Court: must accept for review any decision appealed under a writ of certiorari....

    The U.S. Supreme Court: must accept for review any decision appealed under a writ of certiorari. has only appellate jurisdiction, as the nation's highest tribunal. has original jurisdiction over certain types of cases. hears most of its cases through an appeal by right.

  • Refer to the LawNow article, "The Rule of Law: Two Notable Supreme Court Decisions to Celebrate"...

    Refer to the LawNow article, "The Rule of Law: Two Notable Supreme Court Decisions to Celebrate" written by Rob Normey. According to the article, which of the following statements is FALSE? Select one: a. The concept of the rule of law and the need to strictly comply with it is often presented with a flourish in legal and political debates. b. The article celebrated the Mackeigan v. Hickman (1989) and R. v Westendorp cases c. One essential aspect of the...

  • The U.S. Supreme Court, in Shelby County v. Holder, 133 S.Ct. 2612 (2013), cited changes in...

    The U.S. Supreme Court, in Shelby County v. Holder, 133 S.Ct. 2612 (2013), cited changes in our society as a basis for effectively invalidating key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Many people believe decisions made and actions taken in light of Shelby County v. Holder had a significant impact on the 2016 election. 1. Was the decision consistent with the intent of the Act and current societal realities? AND 2. Do you think the same reasoning employed...

  • The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a California law banning the sale or rental of violent...

    The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a California law banning the sale or rental of violent video games to minors. The court ruled that the law violated free-speech rights and that government did not have the power to “restrict ideas to which children may be   exposed.” In a letter to the IEEE magazine “The Institute”, a reader expressed his disagreement with the court ruling using the following argument: “Minors need to be protected, but not all parents are willing or...

  • Discuss the role of public health in the U.S. what do you think are the most...

    Discuss the role of public health in the U.S. what do you think are the most important problems for public health to address today?

  • 1. Which article and section of the U.S. Constitution outlines the concept of extradition        (returning fugitives...

    1. Which article and section of the U.S. Constitution outlines the concept of extradition        (returning fugitives to the state where the crime occurred).   2. A member of the Senate can kill a bill by talking it to death in a procedure known as a 3. Who acts as the President of the Senate? 4. Who is the current Speaker of the House of Representatives? 5. Which of the following are a Constitutional requirement for becoming          president of the United States?...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT