Question

Civil Liberties Follow These Steps in Creating Your Post Using and citing at least one solid academic source, choose and briefly explain one of the civil liberties protected in the Bill of Rights (examples include speech, press, religion, double jeopardy, etc.). What and whom does it protect and why? Using and citing at least one solid academic source, explain one way in which the government may legally restrict this liberty. In other words, what restrictions on this liberty are allowed by the U.S. Supreme Court? Using and citing evidence from at least one solid academic source, explain whether or not you agree with government being able to restrict this liberty in this way and why (or why not). (THID IS GOVT 2305, THERE IS NO OPTION FOR GOVT SO I SELECT PSYC)

Answer 1

Amendment 4

- Protection from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
The privilege of the general population to be secure in their people, houses, papers, and impacts against preposterous inquiries and seizures will not be damaged, and no warrants will issue butupon reasonable justification, bolstered by promise or confirmation, and especially depicting the spot to be sought and the people or things to be seized.

This amendment protect the right of general population of the country. Every law is made fof the benefits of the citizens of the country. In the fourth amendment the right to protect the people from unreasonable search and seizure.

Under this amendment the rights are given to the general population in order to give protect the general population from unreasonable search and seizure done by law enforcement officers.

The Fourth Amendment applies to a pursuit just if an individual has a "genuine desire for protection" in the spot or thing looked. If not, the alteration offers no insurance in light of the fact that there are, by definition, no protection issues.

Courts for the most part utilize a two-section test (designed by the U.S. Preeminent Court) to decide if, at the season of the hunt, a litigant had an authentic desire for protection in the spot or things looked:

Did the individual really anticipate some level of protection?

Is the individual's desire impartially sensible—that would one say one is, that society is happy to perceive?

For instance, an individual who uses an open bathroom expects not to be spied upon (the individual has a desire for protection), and a great many people—including judges—would believe that desire to be impartially sensible. Subsequently, the establishment of a shrouded camcorder by the police in an open bathroom would be considered a "search" and would be liable to the Fourth Amendment's necessity of sensibility.

Source :- www.criminal.findlaw.com