An auditor for a hardware store chain wished to compare the efficiency of two different auditing techniques. To do this he selected a sample of nine store accounts and applied auditing techniques A and B to each of the nine accounts selected. The number of errors found in each of techniques A and B is listed in the table below:
| Errors in A | Errors in B |
| 27 | 13 |
| 30 | 19 |
| 28 | 21 |
| 30 | 19 |
| 34 | 36 |
| 32 | 27 |
| 31 | 31 |
| 22 | 23 |
| 27 | 32 |
Does the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the
number of errors in auditing technique A is different from the
number of errors in auditing technique B at the 0.05 level of
significance? Select the [Alternative Hypothesis, Value of the Test
Statistic]. (Hint: the samples are dependent)
a) [μD ≠ 0, 1.976]
b) [μD ≠ μ1, 1.976]
c) [μD = 0, 1.976]
d) [μD ≥ 0, 1.976]
e) [A ≠ B, 1.976]
f) None of the above
The statistical software output for this problem is :

Test statistics = 1.976

An auditor for a hardware store chain wished to compare the efficiency of two different auditing...