How does Kant attempt to answer Hume's critique of knowledge?
Hume said about the knowledge that we acquire knowledge only through experience. We can not answer anything we haven't experienced. Kant, on the other hand, tried to expand this critique by saying that there are a number of categories understood by the mind but are not derived from the experience. but with a pure understanding.
Hume may have been right about the connecting experience with knowledge. But he did not give it every dimension he needs. Kant tried to provide that missing dimension. He tried to explain what a true nature of experience is.
How does Kant (attempt) to circumvent Hume's criticism of necessary causation? First, briefly explain the problem raised by Hume and then explain Kant's response.
Identify one of Hume's arguments for defending sentiment over reason. How would Kant respond to that argument?
What is the categorical imperative, according to Kant? Why does Kant think that the categorical imperative does not direct us to consider happiness when we deciding how to act?
What are work, play, rest, and idleness? How does Kant evaluate them?
sociological critique on gentrification How does this affect all parties invloved? How does it affwct the community at large?
Kant believes that acting morally is acting out of duty, so how does this differ from virtue ethics?
How does Institutional Economics and Keynesian Economics critique Neoclassical Economics?
CAN YOU PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTION WITH A CONVINCING ANSWER? THANKS... Explain Hume's view on art and the standard of taste. Do you agree with Hume that some people are more keenly attuned to art objects and that their aesthetic sensibilities are more "delicate"? Or, is he just being a snob?
What, near as you can tell, does Kant mean by 'humanity'?
What does Kant think is special or different about judgments of beauty?