Question

Which human duty towards animals is not derived from any right animals have, and yet honoring that duty may be more important than respecting animal rights, according to Joel Feinberg? What are the implications of this duty for the way humans should treat animals? (Hint: the answer to this question can be found at the end of sections Il of Feinberg's article.)

Answer 1

According to Feinberg’s ethics, the duty of humans towards animals depends on the condition persuaded by ethical and moral means. Humans and animals work together, we used animals for our purposes so that it is our duty to become ethical for animals as we react for human.

Ethical characteristics towards animals related to the understanding, we developed for the utilization of animals. The main difference between ethical norms for human and animals depends on the attitude which determines the ethical objectives.

As we know, human tendency towards animals never been ethical until we are more religious but gradually we developed a deep ideology for their rights. Feinberg proposed a condition engages on rights and punishments for animals ethics, he created a thought process to save the ethical rights of animals and punishment for human.

As a human being, it's our moral duty to concerned about animal’s rights and morality. Feinberg supported rights for every living being on this world and we are responsible to concerned about it.