according to me, a person need not be religious to be moral. there are many people in the world who are very practical in their life rather than religious and are morally correct also. take the example of scientists - for them, science is their religion and we all know what they are doing for their country in morally acceptable ways. many people I know are atheists, and they have moral values also. like - they treat people good, they have good behaviors towards everyone, they do charity not because they think that God will be happy after this but they feel that it makes them happy as well as the people they do charity to.
in my opinion, ethics cannot be fully separated from religion. we live in a country where the supreme power is treated as God and most of the people follow their ethics as per the ways they think that is religiously correct.
Does a person need to be religious to be moral? for example, can an atheist be moral ? can or should ethics be separate...
Question 13 (5 points) Explain two reasons why moral reasoning is stilimportant to religious ethics, even if you believe religion already tells you how to live ethically. Give an ORIGINAL example for each. Format Question 14 (2 points) The major difference between Bentham and Mill's utilitarian moral theories is that while Bentham believes that only the quantity of pleasures and pains matters, Mill believes we also need to pay attention to their
Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that transplant, supposing the availability of the needed organ? How should we choose who gets a transplant, supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them?
Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that transplant, supposing the availability of the needed organ? How should we choose who gets a transplant, supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them?
Recall this week's presentation. Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that transplant, supposing the availability of the needed organ? How should we choose who gets a transplant, supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them? Remember to reply to at least two of your classmates.
Recall this week's presentation. Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that transplant, supposing the availability of the needed organ? How should we choose who gets a transplant, supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them? Remember to reply to at least two of your classmates.
Recall this week's presentation. Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that transplant. supposing the availability of the needed organ? How should we choose who gets a transplant. supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them? Remember to reply to at least two of your classmates.
n. Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that transplant, supposing the availability of the needed organ? How should we choose who gets a transplant, supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them?
1. What does it mean to be an ethical person? In what ways can we evaluate our own moral actions and the actions of others? In your response discuss moral theory (e.g. principles of medical ethics, meta ethical systems like deontology, utilitarianism, or virtue ethics).
[2] In terms utilitarian ethics, discuss the moral issues at stake in the famous so-called Trolley Problem as related in the eText and also Michael Sandel’s Harvard lecture where “you are beside a train track with a train headed down the track. However, on the track ahead are five people who will all be killed if the train continues. But you also have access to a switch, and if you pull it the train will be diverted onto another track...
please answer all of them . Ethics (the moral of the story) 3.Analyze the following criticism over relativism: a.Majority rule b.No criticism from other cultures c.Problem from induction 4.Explain Prof James Rachel three universal values 5.Do we need to be moral relativist to tolerate other people cultures? Explain and justify your answer.