Question








You have been asked to evaluate these three mutually exclusive alternatives each with a different useful life. Your companys
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Statement for the calculation of Annual Cash flow

Annual revenue

25,000

35,000

30,000

Less Annual expenses

4,000

6,500

6,000

Operating income

21,000

28,500

24,000

Add Depreciation expenses

33,333

35,000

20,833

Annual cashflow

54,333

63,500

44,833

Project A

Project B

Project C

Particular

Time

PVF@15%

Amount

PV

Amount

PV

Amount

PV

Cash outflow

100,000

100,000

140,000

140,000

125,000

125,000

Present value of cash outflow

100,000

140,000

125,000

Cash inflow

(1-3)

2.2832

55,433

79912

(1-4)

2.8549

35,000

99921.5

(1-6)

3.7845

44,833

169670.5

Present value of cash inflow

79912

99921.5

169670.5

Net present value

-20,088

-40,079

44,670

So from all of the above Project C is best as it has positive and maximum Net present value.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
You have been asked to evaluate these three mutually exclusive alternatives each with a different useful li...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • 0.6. Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen):...

    0.6. Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen): Solar Panel A Solar Panel B Capital investment, $ 7,000 13.000 Annual operating expenses, SL 2.200 2.000 Market value, $ 1.000 2.30) Useful life, years 12 The MARR is 12% per year. Determine (using FW method) which alternative should be selected if the analysis period is 18 years, the repeatability assumption does not apply, and a solar panel can be leased for $6,000 per...

  • Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen). The...

    Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen). The MARR is 5% per year. I need the PW of the Lead Acid and Lithium Ion. Problem 6-28 (algorithmic) EQuestion Help Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen) The MARR is 5% per year ead Acid $7,000 thium lon Capital investment Annual expenses Useful life Market value at end of useful life $13,000 $2.500 $2,750 12...

  • A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of an upgrade to an existing...

    A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of an upgrade to an existing transportation network. At EOY 10, alternative III would be replaced with another alternative Ill having the same installed cost and net annual revenues. If MARR is 10% per year, which alternative (if any) should be chosen? Use the incremental IRR procedure. $40,000 $6,500 $20,000 $5,200 Installed cost Net annual revenue Salvage value Useful life Calculated IRR $30,000 $5,600 0 20 years 18.0% 20 years...

  • 4. (10 points) A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production...

    4. (10 points) A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program. The alternatives are: Initial Cost $20,000 $30,000 $50,000 Uniform Annual Benefit $4,000 $5,000 $6,500 Useful Life Salvage Value $2,000 $9,000 The MARR is 10%. Which alternative do you recommend? Be sure to use the proper technique when comparing alternatives with different useful lives.

  • The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you. The life of all alternatives...

    The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you. The life of all alternatives is 10 years. A В C Capital investment Annual expenses $60,000 $90,000 $40,000 $30,000 $70,000 35,000 45,000 15,000 30,000 40,000 25,000 16,000 Annual revenues 50,000 52.000 38,000 28,000 Market value at EOY 10 15,000 10,000 10,000 39.0% 10,000 IRR ??? 7.4% 30.8% 9.2% After the base alternative has been identified, the first comparison to be made in an incremental analysis should be which of...

  • Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each wernative we...

    Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each wernative we given below. The study period is 30 years and the firm's MARR is 6% per year. Assume repeatability and reinvestment of positive cash balances at 6 per year a. What is the simple payback period for Alternative 1? b. What is the annual worth of Alternative 2? c. What is the IRR of the incremental cash flows of Alternative 2 compared to Aheative 1?...

  • The following data have been estimated for two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, A and B, associated...

    The following data have been estimated for two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, A and B, associated with a small engineering project for which revenues as well as expenses are involved. They have useful lives of 3 and 5 years, respectively. If MARR = 10% per year, show which alternative is more desirable by using equivalent-worth methods. Use the repeatability assumption. Project A B Investment $5,000 $6,000 Cash flow/yr $1,450 $1,600 Usual Life 3 5 Salvage value $500 $500

  • engineering economy QUESTION 2 The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you A...

    engineering economy QUESTION 2 The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you A B C E Capital investment $60,000 $90,000 $40,000 $30,000 $70,000 Annual expenses $30,000 $40,000 $25,000 $15,000 $35,000 Annual revenues $50,000 $52,000 $38,000 $28,000 $45,000 MV at EOY 10 $15,000 $15,000 $10,000 $10,000 $15,000 IRR 31.5 % 7.4 % 30.8 % 42.5 % 9.2 % The life span of all alternatives is 10 years.. Using a MARR of 15 % per year, what is the...

  • Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...

    Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given next. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. B Investment cost Annual expenses Annual revenues Market value Useful life $28,000 $15,000 $23,000 $6,000 10 years 10 years 10 years 26.4% $55,000 $40,000 $22,000 $32,000 $10,000 $13,000 $28,000 $8,000 24.7% 22.4% IRR A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to...

  • Please DO NOT use excel. Show all steps please. You have 2 mutually exclusive alternatives and a MARR of 9%. Which alternative is preferred, based on repeatability assumption? Alternative E F Cap...

    Please DO NOT use excel. Show all steps please. You have 2 mutually exclusive alternatives and a MARR of 9%. Which alternative is preferred, based on repeatability assumption? Alternative E F Capital Investment $14,000 $65,000 Annual Expenses $14,000 $9,000 Useful Life (years) 4 20 Market Value at end of useful life $8,000 $13,000

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT