Question

Business Law 226 Chapter 36 Assignment Glamor Noke Case: Glamor Noke Inc., operates several lines of clothing stores. The company imposes a "Look Policy" that governs its employees' dress. The Look Policy prohibits "caps" a term not defined. Samantha Laruaf applied for a position in a Glamor store, and was interviewed by Heather Cooke, the store's assistant manager. At the interview, Ms. Laruaf a practicing Muslin wore a headscarf pursuant to her religious beliefs. Using Glamor's ordinary system for evaluating applicants, Cooke gave Laruaf a rating that qualified her to be hired. Cooke was concerned, however, that Laruaf's headscarf would conflict with the store's Look Policy. Cooke sought the store manager's guidance to clarify whether the headscarf was a forbidden "cap." When this yielded no answer, Cooke turned to Randall Johnson, the district manager. Cooke informed Johnson that she believed Laruaf wore her headscarf because of her faith. Johnson told Cooke that Laruaf's headscarf would violate the Look Policy, as would all other headwear, religious or not to hire Laruaf. Glamor refused to hire Ms. Laruaf. otherwise, and directed Co The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a suit on Laruaf's behalf alleging a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Discuss-what will be the result and why?