## R output
> Unexposed=c(8,11,12,14,20,43,111)
> Exposed=c(35,56,83,92,128,150,176,208)
>
>
> wilcox.test(x=Unexposed, y = Exposed,
+ alternative = "less",
+ mu = 25, conf.level = 0.95)
Wilcoxon rank sum test
data: Unexposed and Exposed
W = 3, p-value = 0.001088
alternative hypothesis: true location shift is less than 25
## Comment: The estimated p-value is 0.001088 and less than 0.05
level of significance. Hence, we reject the null hypothesis and
accept the claim that the mean cotinine level in the population of
exposed children is more than 25 units higher than that of
unexposed children at 0.05 level of significance.
5. The paper "Measuring the exposure of infants to tobacco smoke," (New England Journal of Medicine,...
Unexposed: 8,11,12,14,20,43,111
Exposed: 35,56,83,92,128,150,176,208
Suppose that X = (Xi, X2, . . . , Xn) and Y = (y,Y2, . . . ,Yn) are random samples from continuous distributions F and G, respectively. Wilcoxon's two-sample test statistic W = W(X,Y) is defined to be Σ-ngi Ri where Ri is the rank of in the combined sample. 5. The paper "Measuring the exposure of infants to tobacco smoke," (New England Journal of Medicine, 1984, pp. 1075-1078) compared infants who had been...