Challenge exercise Sometimes class/interface pairs exist in the Java standard library that define exactly the same methods. Often, the interface name ends with Listener and the class name with Adapter. An example is PrintJobListener and PrintJobAdapter. The interface defines some method headers, and the adapter class defines the same methods, each with an empty method body. What might the reason be for having them both?
We need at least 10 more requests to produce the solution.
0 / 10 have requested this problem solution
The more requests, the faster the answer.