Question

The study is conducted to investigate the association between chewing tobacco

 CASE ONE 

The study is conducted to investigate the association between chewing tobacco and oral leukoplakia (a precancerous lesion) among currently active professional baseball players in the southeastern United States. A roster of all active players is obtained (n=500). All potential study subjects agree to participate. Each subject has an interview regarding current use of chewing tobacco and has his mouth examined by a dentist. Of the 500 subjects, 125 subjects chew tobacco and 375 do not chew tobacco. Of the chewers, 25 have evidence of oral leukoplakia. Of the non-chewers, 15 have evidence of oral leukoplakia. All 500 players were followed for a period of 5 years. Of those who had evidence of oral leukoplakia, 18 died of some type of oral cancer. 

Draw a 2 x 2 table demonstrating the relationship between chewing tobacco and oral leukoplakia. In drawing this table, put the exposure variable on the columns and the health outcome variable on the rows. 

Draw a second 2 x 2 table demonstrating the relationship between chewing tobacco and oral leukoplakia, but this time, put the exposure variable on the rows and the health outcome variable on the columns. 

Using the table drawn in part a, compute the prevalence ratio and the prevalence odds ratio of oral leukoplakia for chewers compared to non-chewers. Are these two estimates close to one-another? 

Why are these prevalence measures and not incidence measures? 

Using the table drawn in part b, compute the prevalence ratio and the prevalence odds ratio of oral leukoplakia for chewers compared to non-chewers. Are these estimates equal to their corresponding estimates computed using the table drawn in part a? Explain. 

Ignoring the issue of statistical inference and the control of other variables, what do these results say about the relationship between chewing tobacco and the presence of oral leukoplakia? Calculate the case-fatality rate (actually, a risk) in this study. Why is this a measure of risk? Based on the information provided, why can’t you evaluate whether tobacco chewers have a higher case-fatality risk than non-chewers?

2 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
The study is conducted to investigate the association between chewing tobacco
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • A different group of researchers conducted a similar cross-sectional study to examine the association between regular...

    A different group of researchers conducted a similar cross-sectional study to examine the association between regular alcohol consumption (exposure) and liver cirrhosis (outcome) but used a different study sample. They obtained a prevalence ratio (PR) of disease of 1.60 for the association between alcohol consumption and liver cirrhosis. Which of the following is the correct interpretation of the prevalence ratio (PR)? a) The risk of liver cirrhosis among regular alcohol consumers of alcohol is 1.6 times that of non-regular alcohol...

  • n Table 1 below, all true cases and true controls in a reference (total) population of...

    n Table 1 below, all true cases and true controls in a reference (total) population of 10,000 subjects are included in a case-control study assessing the relationship of risk factor A with disease Y. Calculate the exposure odds for both groups and the exposure odds ratio given these data Table 1: Cases Controls 500 Exposed Unexposed 5007200 1800 1000 9000

  • Question 1 A researcher conducted a study to examine the association between having a central venous...

    Question 1 A researcher conducted a study to examine the association between having a central venous catheter and the risk of developing bloodstream infection (measured as infected vs. not infected). The results for this association show an odds ratio (OR) of 1.52 with a 95%CI of (1.29 – 2.15). Thus you conclude that……………………………….    Question 2 A researcher conducted a study to examine the association between oral care with Chlorhexidine Gluconate and the risk of developing ventilator associated pneumonia (measured...

  • Question 1 A researcher conducted a study to examine the association between having a central venous...

    Question 1 A researcher conducted a study to examine the association between having a central venous catheter and the risk of developing bloodstream infection (measured as infected vs. not infected). The results for this association show an odds ratio (OR) of 1.52 with a 95%CI of (1.29 – 2.15). Thus you conclude that……………………………….    Question 2 A researcher conducted a study to examine the association between oral care with Chlorhexidine Gluconate and the risk of developing ventilator associated pneumonia (measured...

  • In your opinion, which of the below three study design is best to assess the relationship...

    In your opinion, which of the below three study design is best to assess the relationship between smoking and CRC? Why? (6 sentences) No plagiarism please Cross Sectional Study 1. Verga Enterprises is conducting a study to assess the relationship between smoking and colorectal cancer (CRC). In the survey that was conducted, 20 out of 100 non-smokers had CRC, while 40 out of 60 smokers had CRC. (a) What makes this a Cross Sectional study design? This particular case is...

  • Problem #1 A study is conducted to estimate the association between exposure to lead paint in...

    Problem #1 A study is conducted to estimate the association between exposure to lead paint in childhood and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Data on n = 400 children are collected, and data on exposure and ADHD diagnosis are shown in Table 9–26. TABLE 9–26 Exposure to Lead Paint and ADHD Exposure to Lead Paint ADHD No ADHD Total Yes 34 71 105 No 29 266 295 The information from Problem #1 is needed to answer Question 2. TABLE 9–27 Exposure...

  • Problem #1 A study is conducted to estimate the association between exposure to lead paint in childhood and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Data on n = 400 children are collected, an...

    Problem #1 A study is conducted to estimate the association between exposure to lead paint in childhood and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Data on n = 400 children are collected, and data on exposure and ADHD diagnosis are shown in Table 9–26. TABLE 9–26 Exposure to Lead Paint and ADHD Exposure to Lead Paint ADHD No ADHD Total Yes 34 71 105 No 29 266 295 The information from Problem #1 is needed to answer Question 2. TABLE 9–27 Exposure...

  • Total You reflected on your study design and this time you randomly selected from a pool...

    Total You reflected on your study design and this time you randomly selected from a pool of all high school students in the city of Charlotte. This time your results are as follows: Poor Memory Good Memory Function (D+) Function (D-) Sleep Deprived (E+) 80 60 140 Not Sleep Deprived (E-) 120 240 360 Total 200 300 500 5. What is the odds ratio of poor memory function for those sleep deprived compared to those who are not sleep deprived?...

  • Question 9 In a case-control study examining the relationship between hypertension and myocardial infarction, there were...

    Question 9 In a case-control study examining the relationship between hypertension and myocardial infarction, there were 20,000 participants. Half of the study subjects had hypertension. Among those with hypertension, 180 had a myocardial infarction. Among those who did not have hypertension, only 30 had a myocardial infarction. When you set up the two by two table, what is d? 180 9820 30 9970 210 19790 Question 10 In a case-control study examining the relationship between hypertension and myocardial infarction, there...

  • help Consider the following data from a study examining the relationship between smoking behaviour and 20-year...

    help Consider the following data from a study examining the relationship between smoking behaviour and 20-year survival status of 1314 women (Appleton et al. 1996). Status after 20 years Dead Alive Smoker 139 443 Non-smoker 230 502 Total 369 945 Total 582 732 1314 (a) Determine each of the following: (i) The percentage of the smoker group who died in 20 years. (ii) The proportion of the non-smoker group who died in 20 years. (iii) The risk of death for...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT