| Please give positive ratings so I can keep answering. Thanks! |
|
Workings | ||||||||
| Cost of Production Report | FIFO Method | Calculation of Direct materials received: | Note | ||||||
| Whole Units | Equivalent Units | Completed during the month | 370,000.00 | ||||||
| Material | Conversion | Add: closing | 50,000.00 | ||||||
| Physical Flow Schedule | Less: opening | 100,000.00 | |||||||
| Units charged to production: | Direct materials received | 320,000.00 | A | ||||||
| Inventory in process on Feb 1 | 100,000.00 | ||||||||
| Direct materials received | 320,000.00 | See Note A | Started and completed in Feb | ||||||
| Total units accounted | 420,000.00 | Goods finished in Feb- | 370,000.00 | ||||||
| Less: Opening work in process | 100,000.00 | ||||||||
| Equivalnet Units | Started and completed in Feb | 270,000.00 | B | ||||||
|
Inventory in Process, Feb 1 (40% completed) |
100,000.00 | - | 60,000.00 | ||||||
| Started and completed in Feb | 270,000.00 | 270,000.00 | 270,000.00 | See Note B | |||||
| Goods finished in Feb | 370,000.00 | 270,000.00 | 330,000.00 | ||||||
|
Inventory in Process, Feb 28 (60% completed) |
50,000.00 | 50,000.00 | 30,000.00 | ||||||
| Equivalnet Units | 420,000.00 | 320,000.00 | 360,000.00 | ||||||
| COSTS | Total | ||||||||
| Costs per equivalent unit | |||||||||
| Total costs for Feb | 211,000.00 | 370,000.00 | 581,000.00 | ||||||
| Total equivalent units | 320,000.00 | 360,000.00 | |||||||
| Unit costs | 0.66 | 1.03 | |||||||
| Valuation of Inventories & Cost reconcilation | |||||||||
| Inventory in Process, Feb 1 | 60,000.00 | ||||||||
| Costs incurred in Feb | 581,000.00 | ||||||||
| Total costs accounted for | 641,000.00 | ||||||||
| Costs allocated to completed and partially completed units | |||||||||
| Inventory in Process, Feb 1 | 60,000.00 | ||||||||
| To complete Inventory in Process, Feb 1 | - | 61,666.67 | 61,666.67 | ||||||
| Started and completed in Feb | 178,031.25 | 277,500.00 | 455,531.25 | ||||||
| Finished goods in Feb | 577,197.92 | ||||||||
| Inventory in Process, Feb 28 | 32,968.75 | 30,833.33 | 63,802.08 | ||||||
| Total costs assigned | 641,000.00 | ||||||||
| Note: in FIFO method only production cost during the month is allocated among equivalent units. | |||||||||
| Cost of Production Report | Weighted Average Method | ||||||||
| Whole Units | Equivalent Units | ||||||||
| Material | Conversion | ||||||||
| Physical Flow Schedule | |||||||||
| Units charged to production: | |||||||||
| Inventory in process on Feb 1 | 100,000.00 | ||||||||
| Direct materials received | 320,000.00 | See Note A | |||||||
| Total units accounted | 420,000.00 | ||||||||
| Equivalnet Units | |||||||||
|
Inventory in Process, Feb 1 (40% completed) |
100,000.00 | 100,000.00 | 100,000.00 | ||||||
| Started and completed in Feb | 270,000.00 | 270,000.00 | 270,000.00 | See Note B | |||||
| Goods finished in Feb | 370,000.00 | 370,000.00 | 370,000.00 | ||||||
|
Inventory in Process, Feb 28 (60% completed) |
50,000.00 | 50,000.00 | 30,000.00 | ||||||
| Equivalnet Units | 420,000.00 | 420,000.00 | 400,000.00 | ||||||
| COSTS | Total | ||||||||
| Costs per equivalent unit | |||||||||
| Total costs for Feb | 231,000.00 | 410,000.00 | 641,000.00 | ||||||
| Total equivalent units | 420,000.00 | 400,000.00 | |||||||
| Unit costs | 0.55 | 1.03 | |||||||
| Valuation of Inventories & Cost reconcilation | |||||||||
| Inventory in Process, Feb 1 | 60,000.00 | ||||||||
| Costs incurred in Feb | 641,000.00 | ||||||||
| Total costs accounted for | 701,000.00 | ||||||||
| Costs allocated to completed and partially completed units | |||||||||
| To complete Inventory in Process, Feb 1 | 55,000.00 | 102,500.00 | 157,500.00 | ||||||
| Started and completed in Feb | 148,500.00 | 276,750.00 | 425,250.00 | ||||||
| Finished goods in Feb | 582,750.00 | ||||||||
| Inventory in Process, Feb 28 | 27,500.00 | 30,750.00 | 58,250.00 | ||||||
| Total costs assigned | 641,000.00 | ||||||||
| Note: in Weighted Average method total cost (production+ Opening WIP) is allocated among equivalent units. | |||||||||
problem (100 points): Production Report under Process Costing: Springville Company produces a product that passes through...
show all steps
Problem 11 (100 points): Productio Springville Company produces a pro Cooking. In the Blending Departmen other manufacturing inputs areas Production Report under Process Costing: ces a product that passes through two departments: Blending and Department, all materials are added at the beginning of the process. All puts are added uniformly. The following information pertains to the Blending Department for February, 2014: a) BWIP, February 1: 100.000 poun related costs: "Y 100,000 pounds, 40N complete with respect to...
please answer the followinf question.
Process Costing (Cornerstone Pages): The mixing department of Seville Company uses two processes, Blending and Cooking. The following information pertains to the Blending Department for February. Units in Beginning Work in Process (40% complete) Units Completed and Transferred Out Units in Ending Work in Process (60% complete) 100,000 370,000 50,000 Production Costs are as follows: Cost for Beginning WIP: Materials Conversion Total: $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 Current Costs: Materials Conversion Total: $200,000 $350,000 $550,000 * Note:...
FIFO Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for: Units,...
FIFO Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for: Units,...
Nonuniform Inputs Apeto Company produces premium chocolate candy bars. Conversion costs are added uniformly. For February, EWIP is 40 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Materials are added at the beginning of the process. The following information is provided for February: Physical flow schedule: Units to account for: Units in BWIP 0 Units started 70,000 Total units to account for 70,000 Units accounted for: Units completed: From BWIP 0 Started and completed 45,000 45,000 Units in EWIP 25,000 Total...
The
same problem under FIFO method
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly, In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production...
Cornerstone Exercise 6.6 (Algorithmic) Nonuniform Inputs Apeto Company produces premium chocolate candy bars. Conversion costs are added uniformly. For February, EWIP is 40 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Materials are added at the beginning of the process. The following information is provided for February: Physical flow schedule: Units to account for: Units in BWIP 0 Units started 70,000 Total units to account for 70,000 Units to account for: Units completed: From BWIP 0 Started and completed 45,000 45,000...
Seacrest Company uses a process costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: A and B. As work is completed, is transferred out. All inputs are added uniformly in Department A The following summarizes the production activity and costs for November Department A Department B Beginning inventories: Physical units 5,000 8,000 Costs: Transferred in $45,320 Direct materials $10.000 Conversion costs $6.900 $16,800 Current production: 25,000 Units started ? Units transferred out 28.000 33.000 Costs: ?...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Beginning...