| a-1. | Income statement | ||||||
| $ | |||||||
| Sales revenue | (3700*38) | 140600 | |||||
| Less: Cost of goods sold | (Note:1) | 48100 | |||||
| Gross margin | 92500 | ||||||
| Less: General,selling and administrative cost | 64500 | ||||||
| Net income | 28000 | ||||||
| Note:1 | |||||||
| Product cost=Materials,labor and overhead=$ 55900 | |||||||
| Cost per unit=Total product cost/Number of units produced=55900/4300=$ 13 | |||||||
| Cost of goods sold=Units sold*Cost per unit=3700*13=$ 48100 | |||||||
| Balance sheet | |||||||
| $ | |||||||
| Assets | |||||||
| Cash | (140600+92000-55900-64500) | 112200 | |||||
| Inventory | (Note:2) | 7800 | |||||
| Total assets | 120000 | ||||||
| Stockholder's equity | |||||||
| Common stock | 92000 | ||||||
| Retained earnings | 28000 | ||||||
| Total stockholder's equity | 120000 | ||||||
| Note:2 | |||||||
| Inventory=Units in inventory*Cost per unit | |||||||
| Units in inventory=Units produced-Units sold=4300-3700=600 units | |||||||
| Inventory=600*13=$ 7800 | |||||||
| a-2. | Income statement | ||||||
| $ | |||||||
| Sales revenue | (3700*38) | 140600 | |||||
| Less: Cost of goods sold | (Note:1) | 103600 | |||||
| Gross margin | 37000 | ||||||
| Less: General,selling and administrative cost | 0 | ||||||
| Net income | 37000 | ||||||
| Note:1 | |||||||
| Product cost=Materials,labor and overhead+Design ad planning cost=55900+64500=$ 120400 | |||||||
| Cost per unit=Total product cost/Number of units produced=120400/4300=$ 28 | |||||||
| Cost of goods sold=Units sold*Cost per unit=3700*28=$ 103600 | |||||||
| Balance sheet | |||||||
| $ | |||||||
| Assets | |||||||
| Cash | (140600+92000-55900-64500) | 112200 | |||||
| Inventory | (Note:2) | 16800 | |||||
| Total assets | 129000 | ||||||
| Stockholder's equity | |||||||
| Common stock | 92000 | ||||||
| Retained earnings | 37000 | ||||||
| Total stockholder's equity | 129000 | ||||||
| Note:2 | |||||||
| Inventory=Units in inventory*Cost per unit | |||||||
| Units in inventory=Units produced-Units sold=4300-3700=600 units | |||||||
| Inventory=600*28=$ 16800 | |||||||
| b. | Option 2 is the most favorable financial statement since it provides more net income than option 1 | ||||||
| c. | Incentive bonus=Net income*11% | ||||||
| Option 1: | |||||||
| Incentive bonus=28000*11%=$ 3080 | |||||||
| Option 2: | |||||||
| Incentive bonus=37000*11%=$ 4070 | |||||||
| Option 2 gives the higher bonus | |||||||
| d. | Income tax expense=Net income*30% | ||||||
| Option 1: | |||||||
| Income tax expense=28000*30%=$ 8400 | |||||||
| Option 2: | |||||||
| Income tax expense=37000*30%=$ 11100 | |||||||
| Option 1 minimizes the income tax expense | |||||||
Jordan Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $92,000 by issuing common stock. During the...
Walton Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $94,000 by issuing common stock. During the first year of operations, the company incurred specifically identifiable product costs (materials, labor, and overhead) amounting to $64,400. CMC also incurred $78,200 of engineering design and planning costs. There was a debate regarding how the design and planning costs should be classified. Advocates of Option 1 believe that the costs should be classified as general, selling, and administrative costs. Advocates of Option 2 believe...
Campbell Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $95,000 by issuing common stock. During the first year of operations, the company incurred specifically identifiable product costs (materials, labor, and overhead) amounting to $63,000. CMC also incurred $58,500 of engineering design and planning costs. There was a debate regarding how the design and planning costs should be classified. Advocates of Option 1 believe that the costs should be classified as general, selling, and administrative costs. Advocates of Option 2 believe...
Stuart Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $97,000 by issuing common stock. During the first year of operations, the company incurred specifically identifiable product costs (materials, labor, and overhead) amounting to $63,700. CMC also incurred $93,100 of engineering design and planning costs. There was a debate regarding how the design and planning costs should be classified. Advocates of Option 1 believe that the costs should be classified as general, selling, and administrative costs. Advocates of Option 2 believe...
Zachary Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $91,000 by issuing common stock. During the first year of operations, the company incurred specifically identifiable product costs (materials, labor, and overhead) amounting to $50,400. CMC also incurred $67,200 of engineering design and planning costs. There was a debate regarding how the design and planning costs should be classified. Advocates of Option 1 believe that the costs should be classified as general, selling, and administrative costs. Advocates of Option 2 believe...
Gibson Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $99,000 by issuing common stock. During the first year of operations, the company incurred specifically identifiable product costs (materials, labor, and overhead) amounting to $63,700. CMC also incurred $83,300 of engineering design and planning costs. There was a debate regarding how the design and planning costs should be classified. Advocates of Option 1 believe that the costs should be classified as general, selling, and administrative costs. Advocates of Option 2 believe...
Adams Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $95,000 by issuing common stock. During the first year of operations, the company incurred specifically identifiable product costs (materials, labor, and overhead) amounting to $70,500. CMC also incurred $70,500 of engineering design and planning costs. There was a debate regarding how the design and planning costs should be classified. Advocates of Option 1 believe that the costs should be classified as general, selling, and administrative costs. Advocates of Option 2 believe...
Benson Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $95,000 by issuing common stock. During the first year of operations, the company incurred specifically identifiable product costs (materials, labor, and overhead) amounting to $73,500. CMC also incurred $63,700 of engineering design and planning costs. There was a debate regarding how the design and planning costs should be classified. Advocates of Option 1 believe that the costs should be classified as general, selling, and administrative costs. Advocates of Option 2 believe...
Gibson Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $94,000 by issuing common stock. During the first year of operations, the company incurred specifically identifiable product costs (materials, labor, and overhead) amounting to $57,200. CMC also incurred $79,200 of engineering design and planning costs. There was a debate regarding how the design and planning costs should be classified. Advocates of Option 1 believe that the costs should be classified as general, selling, and administrative costs Advocates of Option 2 believe...
Rundle Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $91,000 by issuing common stock. During the first year of operations, the company incurred specifically identifiable product costs (materials, labor, and overhead) amounting to $75,000. CMC also incurred $80,000 of engineering design and planning costs. There was a debate regarding how the design and planning costs should be classified. Advocates of Option 1 believe that the costs should be classified as general, selling, and administrative costs. Advocates of Option 2 believe...
How
do I correctly complete this question? Please show work and write
neatly! Thanks
Page Campbell Manufacturing Company (CMC) was started when it acquired $80,000 by issuing common stock. During the first year of operations, the company incurred specifically identifiable product costs (materials, Option 2. Total assets $112,000 labor, and overhead) amounting to $75,000 CMC also incurred $60,000 of engineering design and planning costs. There was a debate regarding how the design and planning costs should be classified. Advocates of...