
Problem 1. Consider the following extensive form game. 2 > 2,3 4,1 3,2 1.2 (a) By...
2. consider the following simultaneous move game. Player B LEFT RIGHT Player A UP 4,1 1,4 DOWN 2,3 3,2 a. If there is a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies, what is it and what are the payoffs? b. If there is a Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies, what is it and what are the expected payoffs? 3. Continue with the previous game but suppose this was a sequential game where Player A got to go first. a. Diagram the game...
survive 1.2. In the following normal-form game, what strategies survive iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies? What are the pure-strategy Nash equilibria? of strictly dominated L CR T 2,0 1,14,2 M 3,4 1,2 2,3 B 1,30,2 3,0
a) Eliminate strictly dominated strategies.b) If the game does not have a pure strategy Nash equilibrium,find the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium for the smaller game(after eliminating dominated strategies). Player 2Player 1abcA4,33,22,4B1,35,33,3
4. Consider the following game matrix: LCR T 3 ,1 0,0 4,1 M10, 02, 24, 3 B 7,6 | 1,2 3,1 (a) Find all the strictly dominated (pure) strategies for each player. (b) Find all the weakly dominated (pure) strategies of each player. (c) Does the game has a strict dominant strategy equilibrium?
4. (General Extensive Form Game ID Suppose the following general extensive-form game. Player 1 Player 2 (0, 4) (4,0 (4, 0) (0, 4) (a) Represent this game in normal form by using a matrix, and find all pure strategy (Bayesian Nash equilibrium (equilibria) b) Does a pure strategy perfect Bayesian equilibrium exist? If so, show it (or them). If not, prove it.
Q.2 Consider the following normal-form game: Player 2 Player 1 3,2 1,1 -1,3 R. 0,0 Q.2.a Identify the pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Q.2.b Identify the mixed-strategy Nash equilibria Q.2.c Calculate each player's expected equilibrium payoff.
Problem 2: Consider the following normal form game: | A | B | C D L 2 ,3 -1,3 0,0 4,3 M -1,0 3,0 / 0,10 2,0 R 1,1 | 2,1 3,1 3,1 Part a: What are the pure strategies that are strictly dominated in the above game? Part 6: What are the rationalizable strategies for each player? What are all the rationalizable strategy profiles? Part c: Find all of the Nash equilibria of the game above.
(20 points) Exercise 3: (Midterm 2018) Consider the following normal-form game, where the pure strategies for Player 1 are U, M, and D, and the pure strategies for Player 2 are L, C, and R. The first payoff in each cell of the matrix belongs to Player 1, and the second one belongs to Player 2. Player 2 IL CR u 6,8 2,6 8,2 Player 1 M 8,2 4,4 9,5 8,10 4,6 6,7 (7) a) Find the strictly dominated (pure)...
Consider the following extensive form game P1 RP:2 L2 R2 L1 R1 (2,2) (0,3) 1. How many sub-games are there in this game? What is the Subgame Perfect Equilibrium? 2. Represent this game as a Normal form game and find all pure strategy Nash Eq. Is there a mixed Nash eq. in this game? If yes, show one. If not, argue why not 3. Now assume that P2 cannot observe P1's action before he makes his move. As such, he...
Consider the following extensive-form game with two players, 1
and 2.
a). Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria of the game. [8
Marks]
b). Find the pure-strategy subgame-perfect equilibria of the
game. [6 Marks]
c). Derive the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of the subgame.
If players play this mixed Nash equilibrium in the subgame, would 1
player In or Out at the initial mode? [6 Marks]
[Hint: Write down the normal-form of the subgame and derive the
mixed Nash equilibrium of...