Question

the problems distributed accordingly. dinucci, citizens of the United States, are in th married for ten years. Sheila has a congenital d. are in their thir genital defect the CASES FOR ANALYSIS 1. John and Sheila Baldinucci, citizen ties and have been married for ter arevents her from having children. The Baldinuccis sionals, easy in their relationship inuccis are well-educated profe heir community. They ient with the delays. At find an English surrogate ther is inseminated in their relationship, and respected in their com have tried to adopt a child, but have grown impatient with this point, they approach an agency that offers to find an Er mother for a fee of $9,000. John goes to England to give sperm. The surrogate mother is inse In a recorded interview, the surrogate claims that she conced with the second insemination attempt. She voluntarily gives un her rights for a fee, leaves the hospital some hours after the birth of the child has not seen the child since. The Baldinuccis then apply for guardianship of the child. The court, considering only the interests of the child, grants the custody on condition that they return to Britain if the court should so order! There is no way to enforce this condition since the couple has no property in England. The couple then returned to the United States with the child in their custody, but not legally adopted. There are doubts as to the citizenship of the child and her rights to in herit. She is at best the illegitimate daughter of John, the natural father, and has no legal claims on Sheila. The gestational mother receives the sum of $30,000 for her story from a magazine, which runs the story without her name but with a picture. agency that had arranged the agreement refuses to pay the surrogate her i since she has made so much from the story. The basic question is whether the good of the child has been a protected. What more should be done to protect the child adoption by Sheila in order? Was the gestational mother riskin hould be done to protect the child? Is an American t? Was the gestational mother risking harm to the

have to answer all questions asked after case study description.

Answer 1

No,the​​​​ good of the Child has not been Protected Yet because the Child is not Legally Adopted.There are Doubt on the Citizenship of the Child.

To protect the Child John And Sheila Baldinucci Should adopt the child Legally by Having some Land in Britain.

No,the Adoption Of Child by Sheila is Not in Order Because She is illegitimate Mother of the Child and not yet Legally adopted too.

No, the Gestational mother wasn't risking any Harm to Child by publishing her story and picture as it is for technological Development and development of Scientific temperment of the Country.

No, ​​​It was not Ethical as the parents Refused to Pay 9000$ to the Surrogate Mother as It was previously Decided that she will be getting this sum of Money