Damaged Identities is a fascinating study of the ways that narratives can oppress some groups of people, and how they can resist that oppression through creating counter stories. Damaged Identities is an original piece of work that deserves attention from philosophers and social theorists. There are, however, a number of questions it raises. A central issue that it is largely silent about is the relation of master narratives to other methods of oppression such as legal exclusion, poverty, and violence. While the focus on narratives may have explanatory value, it is implausible that one can understand narratives in isolation from these other forces that have been discussed at length in other discussions of class systems, racism, sexism, and homophobia. Furthermore, it is not clear how narratives relate to stereotypes, degrading visual images.
I agree with the fact that once labels are applied it increases the chances of persistent oppression or offending. This is because the narrative theory and the concept of counterstories relate to psychological theories of self-esteem and the importance of role models. The offenders take advantage of the lack of self-esteem and confidence and use them against the victim. Because the victims do not have any power against the offenders, this usually leads to persistent oppression.
Describe the concept of damaged identity? Explain why you agree or disagree with the idea that...
What is cultural imperialism? Do you agree or disagree with the the idea of the theory? Explain why .
1. Do you agree that the companies identified are monopolies? Explain why you agree or disagree. If you don't think they are monopolies, what other companies compete with them? Ans. I disagree that the companies mentioned in the videos like amazon, Google, Netflix, etc are not monopolies. Because all these companies have competitors in a large number. We can say that these companies are one of the leading companies from their field but not a monopoly. Like
[b] State if you agree or disagree with each of the following statements. For the latter, explain why you disagree with the statement. (i) [3 marks] The dynamic range of a technique lies between the limit of detection and the limit of quantification. (ii) 3 marks] Based on an absorbance versus concentration (in ppm) calibration plot, the sensitivity of the technique was estimated in ppm. iii) [3 marks] The Chief Analyst wrote in a report for a client, "By following...
In considering life-course theory, describe how disruption promotes delinquency. Do you agree or disagree with this concept?
Some people believe that cities cannot be sustainable. Explain why you would agree or disagree with this statement.
Identify and describe sources of labels. Next, discuss how labels from the juvenile justice system can be devastating on our youth. Explain why you agree or disagree with this idea.
3) Please summarize “utilitiarianism”, and explain overall why you agree or disagree with this ethical model as the primary roadmap of personal and business ethics.
Labor Economics State whether you agree or disagree with each of the following statements. If you agree with the statement, explain why you agree, and if you disagree, explain why you disagree (include the correct statement in your answer). Illustrate your answers using diagrams where appropriate. a) An increase in the price of employer provided health insurance is likely to lead to an increase in the number of hours worked by employees. b) All else equal, a firm that requires...
do you agree with government about death penalty? why do you agree or disagree ?
Explain bar stool economics and do you agree or disagree