Obesity/Starvation: Who is responsible?
In the US, we have an obesity "epidemic". What does this mean? Why is it happening? Who is responsible (parents, advertisers, fast food restaurants, doctors, school lunches, junk food manufacturers, etc.)? Should the government intervene if parents are raising an obese child? Given that a large portion of the world is hungry or starving, do we have a social/legal/ethical/moral responsibility to change this problem? Use the following websites as a starting point for your answer. You must post your initial answer to these questions and two other comments on other posts.
Generally when we have sufficient kinds of food to eat and have all resources to fulfill that foodie habit, then we get obese. When we have lack of resources and not sufficient money to fulfill our hunger we get starvation.
Obesity epidemic means obesity is found in a particular area to a larger extent. And is common in that area to be obese. It is happening due to our random eating habits to eat junk and ready made food meals. We don't have enough time to cook daily, so we rely on outside food sources. Mainly parents are responsible because they did not inculcated habits of cooking for self, in their children. The advantage of this outlooking habit will obviously be taken by advertiser and junk food making companies. No, government should not intervene because it's their personal choice. They can be given views and advice by their doctor but government has nothing to do with individual decisions.
Yes, if a large group of population is starving,we have ethical social and moral responsibility to change this problem. We can contribute in terms of food money etc to satisfy their hunger immediately. And can support them by advising them to send their children to schools to get educated. Education will uplift their condition in future. We can give them work according to their present skills so that they won't be hungry anymore and can earn a living.
Obesity/Starvation: Who is responsible? In the US, we have an obesity "epidemic". What does this mean?...
What Exactly Does Being “Creative” and “Effective” Mean?
An argument can be made that “effective” or successful
advertising is usually being creative with a purpose. Certainly,
the notion of effective advertising can vary from culture to
culture. In the United Kingdom, a premium may be placed on being
different, humorous, or out-of-the ordinary in differentiating
campaigns from the mass of mediocre advertising.
In the United States, creative advertising is viewed more often
as being “effective” in that the creativity has...
befor answering the question you have to look at the
case.
here is the question
it should be 200 words
here is the case
3. Should McDonald's offer healthy alternatives to the same extent in all of the countries in which it operates, or just those where it has been criticized in the pa or is it expecting further regulation? What if customers overseas do not want hea options? Global McEthics: should McDonald's ethics be standardized across the globe? This...