`Hey,
Note: Brother if you have any queries related the answer please do comment. I would be very happy to resolve all your queries.
For 1 entry T=O(log(n))
So, for n entries starting when it is empty.
T=O(log(1))+O(log(2))+O(log(3))....+O(log(n))
So,
T<=n*log(n)
So,
T=O(n*log(n))
Kindly revert for any queries
Thanks.
c. If an algorithm executes O(log n)-time computation for each entry of an array storing n...
Selection Sort is a common algorithm to sort the elements of an array. First, it scans the elements of the array to find the smallest value and places it at index 0, thus creating a sorted “subarray” of size 1 that contains the smallest value. Then it scans the remaining unsorted values for the new smallest value and places it at index 1, creating a sorted subarray of size 2 that contains the 2 smallest values. It continues in this...
We know that binary search on a sorted array of size n takes O(log n) time. Design a similar divide-and-conquer algorithm for searching in a sorted singly linked list of size n. Describe the steps of your algorithm in plain English. Write a recurrence equation for the runtime complexity. Solve the equation by the master theorem.
An algorithm A executes some instructions to solve a problem of size n, the total number of instruction is Θ (n3). An algorithm B executes half the instructions of A to solve the same problem of size n. What is the Big Theta of B (justify your answer) ?
Give an algorithm to determine whether or not the elements of an array of integers are all unique. Argue that your algorithm is correct, and that it terminates (doesn’t run forever). Give best and worst case run-time analyses. That is, what are big-O and big-Omega for your algorithm?
Give an algorithm with the following properties. • Worst case running time of O(n 2 log(n)). • Average running time of Θ(n). • Best case running time of Ω(1).
Please compute the time complexity of the algorithm. (ex: O(N)
or O(N log N))
void Set::unite(const Set& seti, const Set& set2) { const Set* sp = &set2; if (this == &seti) { if (this == &set2) return; } else if (this == &set2) sp = &setl; else { *this = seti; if (&setl == &set2) return; } Node* pl = m_head->m_next; Node* p 2 = sp->m_head->m_next; while (pl != m_head & & p2 != sp->m_head) { if (pl->m_value < p2->m_value)...
3. For each of the following situations, name the best sorting algorithm we studied. (For one or two questions, there may be more than one answer deserving full credit, but you only need to give one answer for each.) The array is mostly sorted already (a few elements are in the wrong place). (a) You need an O(n log n) sort even in the worst case and you cannot use any extra space except for a few local variables. (b)...
Q. Give a divide- and- conquer algorithm that computes the number of inversions in array A in O(n log n) time. Show that your algorithm takes O(n log n).
Give an efficient algorithm to compute the union of sets A and B, where n = max(|A|, |B|). The output should be an array of distinct elements that form the union of the sets, such that they appear exactly once in the union. Assume that A and B are unsorted. Give an O(n log n) time algorithm for the problem.
Suppose that you are given an array of N elements. Develop an optimum algorithm that finds the minimum k elements of this array in at most nlogn time. Try your algorithm on an example N-sized array and some value of k.