Question

Which is the best positioned firm in the voice wars? Weakest positioned? Consider Google, Apple, and Amazon. Is voice a winner-take-all or winner-take-most market? What should Google’s strategy be in voice? What is the business model? How should it be different from Amazon, Apple, and others?

Answer 1

‌It came out that Google is the best position form in the voice war. Google assistant has a different and the top position in the voice war. Apple's Siri takes the third place and is the weakest in the voice war. In this world of Technology, every customer wants to make no effort to make the work done. Voice war is the market of winner take most. Google Amazon and Apple occupy different spaces in different markets. In the world of Android users, Google acquires the first position, whereas, in iPhone users, Apple voice that is Siri acquires its separate position—working of Amazon when does the market of household operations. Google's strategy should be to identify the need and wants of the customer and improvised the Google assistant to win all the market of mobiles and leave no loop for competitors to take its place. Research should do know the requirement and the expectation of their customers. Google tends to acquire a significant trust in itself from its shareholders from a more prolonged period. It was not difficult for Google to build up a business model for Google assistant. To stand out of the box in mobiles, Google should act innovate active and bring up something that distinguishes it from Amazon and Apple. It should research the customer's behavior and come up with the idea that it combines all the essential features.