C.
In cost accounting, a sell or process further decision asks whether to sell a product “as is” at the splitoff point, or to process further. The splitoff point is the point when the costs of two or more products can be separately identified. There are two criteria you use to justify further processing (and more costs):
• If the product has a sales value at splitoff, maybe it’s better to sell it.
• If the incremental revenue from further processing is greater than the incremental cost of further processing, maybe it’s better to continue processing.
Some products simply don’t have a sales value at splitoff. The product’s production isn’t far enough along for it to be sold yet. No customers (or not enough customers) would consider buying the product at splitoff. Think about selling blue jeans without zippers or belt loops; it’s probably not a good idea.
If you can’t calculate a sales value at splitoff, there’s no “sell or process further” decision to make. To have a viable product to sell, you need to keep processing.
But wait! There are times when a partially completed product at splitoff has value to someone. Say you make cabinets. You’ve run production on two types of products, and you’re now at splitoff. Neither type of cabinet is ready to be sold to a customer because you have to complete the sanding and finishing on the wood. You also have to install metal handles.
The product is clearly not ready for a regular customer (likely a retail store that sells to the public). However, another business may ask you for a price quote for the partially completed goods. Maybe another cabinetmaker is having trouble filling a large order. It might be willing to buy your partially finished cabinets. In that scenario, you essentially become an industry supplier.
Joint costs are irrelevant for your “sell or process further” decision. Those costs are the same, whether you sell the product at splitoff or process further. In this case, joint costs are sunk or past costs. In other words, they’ve already been paid.
Incremental revenue is the additional revenue you get from selling one more unit that has been processed further. Incremental cost is the additional cost. If you spend $5 more per unit, and earn $7 more from selling that unit, your incremental revenue is $2 higher than the incremental cost. Incremental, in this case, refers to the production from splitoff to a completed product.
D.
The four joint cost allocation methods are:
1. Market or sales value method:
The market or sales value method allocates a joint production cost on the basis of relative market or sales values of individual joint products.
2. Quantitative or physical unit method:
This method uses some physical measurement units (such as volume, weight etc.) to allocate joint production cost.
3. Average unit cost method:
The average unit cost method, as the name implies, uses average unit cost to allocate the cost before split-off point.
4. Weighted average method:
This method assigns predetermined weight factors to joint products based on various factors such as price, production complexity and unit size of the product.
The splitoff method in cost accounting
After splitoff, each product incurs separable (or independent) costs. Allocating joint costs using sales value at splitoff may be the most effective method for planning and budgeting for joint costs.
(c) Identify the revenue or expense amounts necessary to make a sell-or-process-further decision and the reasons...
Options for 1-6:
(1): process further / sell as is
(2): decreases / increases (3): process
further / sell as is (4): be higher if they
do / be lower if they do (5): different / the same
(6): is / is not
3. Interlock Soy Products (USP) buys soybeans and processes them into other soy products. Each ton of soybeans that USP purchases for $320 can be converted for an additional $200 into 675 lbs of soy meal and 120 gallons of soy oil....
Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were $50,000, and 14,000 units of overs and 35,000 units of unders were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, $18,000; unders, $19,900. Overs sell for $2.00 per unit; unders sell for $3.14 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the $50,000 joint costs using the estimated...
Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were $50,000, and 15,000 units of overs and 35,000 units of unders were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, $20,000; unders, $19,900. Overs sell for $2.00 per unit; unders sell for $3.14 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the $50,000 joint costs using the estimated...
In making decisions about whether to sell or further process joint products, allocated joint cost amounts are __________. essential useful not relevant useful depending on the method chosen
A sell-or-process further decision involves deciding whether to Accept a special order for a price lower than normal Continue a product line or eliminate it Sella product as is or continue to refine it Produce a product in-house or outsource it Knowledge Check 02 Potomac Backpacks, Inc. manufactures regular backpacks. The company is considering processing these backpacks further to produce hiking backpacks. A summary of the expected costs and revenues for both of these options follows: Hiking Backpacks Ordinary Activity...
SELL AT SPLIT – OFF POINT OR PROCESS FURTHER & JOINT COST ALLOCATION Lauricella Inc. produces three products from a common set of inputs for $95,000. Other sales and cost data follow: Unit Sales Price ____ Costs After At After further Split-off Product Quantity Split-off Processing Point__ Regular 8,000 $ 8 $ 10 $ 10,000 Special 5,000 5 8 15,000 Premium 4,000 6 10 20,000 REQUIRED: Which products should...
Problem 12-20 Sell or Process Further Decision [LO12-7] (Prepared from a situation suggested by Professor John W. Hardy.) Lone Star Meat Packers is a major processor of beef and other meat products. The company has a large amount of T-bone steak on hand, and it is trying to decide whether to sell the T-bone steaks as they are initially cut or to process them further into filet mignon and the New York cut. If the T-bone steaks are sold as...
Problem 12-20 Sell or Process Further Decision [LO12-7] (Prepared from a situation suggested by Professor John W. Hardy.) Lone Star Meat Packers is a major processor of beef and other meat products. The company has a large amount of T-bone steak on hand, and it is trying to decide whether to sell the T-bone steaks as they are initially cut or to process them further into filet mignon and the New York cut If the T-bone steaks are sold as...
Problem 11-20 Sell or Process Further Decision [LO11-7J (Prepared from a situation suggested by Professor John W. Hardy) Lone Star Meat Packers is a major processor of beef and other meat products. The company has a large amount of T-bone steak on hand, and it is trying to decide whether to sell the T-bone steaks as they are initially cut or to process them further into filet mignon and the New York cut. If the T-bone steaks are sold as...
Problem 11-20 Sell or Process Further Decision [LO11-7 (Prepared from a situation suggested by Professor John W. Hardy) Lone Star Meat Packers is a major processor of beef and other meat products. The company has a large amount of T-bone steak on hand, and it is tryling to decide whether to sell the T-bone steaks as they are initially cut or to process them further into filet mignon and the New York cut If the T-bone steaks are sold as...