If L is recursive, is it necessarily true that L^+ is also
recursive?
Peter Lin: Formal Language and Automata
Recursive languages are closed under the following operations. That is, if L and P are two recursive languages, then the following languages are recursive as well :
The concatenation L\circ P
The union L\cup P
The intersection L\cap P
The complement of L
The Kleene closure or Kleene star L*
The Kleene Plus L+ (Which You were asking)
The set difference L-P
The last property follows from the fact that the set difference can
be expressed in terms of intersection and complement.
"Every Language type which is closed under Kleene star, is also closed under Kleene Plus.
Every Language type which is NOT closed under Kleene star, is also NOT closed under Kleene Plus. "
If L is recursive, is it necessarily true that L^+ is also recursive? Peter Lin: Formal...
formal languages and automata
Construct an NPDA for accepting the language L = {ww^R: we {a, b}*}
AUTOMATA Given the language L, L = {w | w ∈ {a, b}* and w starts and ends with the same symbol} (a) Define the context free grammar G that generates the formal language L. (b) Define the deterministic pushdown automaton A that recognize the formal language L.
Is it true that every recursively enumerable language is recursive, and is it true that every language is recursively enumerable?
Let L be a recursive language. Define L' = {x : there is y such that yxy belongs to L. Show that L' is r.e.
1. If L is the complement of a language recognized by a non-deterministic finite automaton, then L is _______ a) finite b) regular but not necessarily finite c) deterministic context-free but not necessarily regular d) context-free but not necessarily deterministic context-free e) recursive (that is, decidable) but not necessarily context-free f) recursively enumerable (that is, partially decidable) but not necessarily recursive g) not recursively enumerable
formal language automata
1. (15p) Consider the Context-free grammar G defined by: S → 0A1A1A1A A0A1A a) Describe L(G). (5p) b) Convert G into a Pushdown Automaton (PDA). (10p)
Construct a NPDA with transition graph using 4 states that accepts the language L={w: na(w)-nb(w)=2} on Σ={a,b} subject-- formal language of automata theory.
Formal languages and automata: Give a regular expression for L={anbm:n?2,m?1,nm?3}
14.) Let L1 = L(a∗baa∗) and L2 = L(aba∗). Find L1/L2. This is a Formal Languages and Automata question... I need to see what the dfa for L1/L2 looks like and how you know what the final states are... Thanks!