Automata Theory

any
doubts please comment
Automata Theory Give a DFA that accepts the language generated by this grammar: → ABC A...
Automata Question. Over the alphabet Σ = {0, 1}: 1) Give a DFA, M1, that accepts a Language L1 = {all strings that contain 00} 2) Give a DFA, M2, that accepts a Language L2 = {all strings that end with 01} 3) Give acceptor for L1 intersection L2 4) Give acceptor for L1 - L2
Automata, Languages & Computation
Question: For = {a,b} construct
the DFA that accepts the language consisting of all strings over
the with no more than
one a.
The DFA constructed should be in a form similar to the below but
obviously built using the above language:
We were unable to transcribe this imageWe were unable to transcribe this imageb b b 1,1 2,3 3,2 a a
b b b 1,1 2,3 3,2 a a
Automata Theory Give a context-free grammar producing the following language over Σ = {0, 1}: {w : every odd position of w is 1 and w = wR} (HINT: All strings in the language will be of odd length).
Part B - Automata Construction Draw a DFA which accepts the following language over the alphabet of {0,1}: the set of all strings such that the number of 0s is divisible by 2 and the number of 1s is divisible by 5. Your DFA must handle all intput strings in {0,1}*. Here is a methodical way to do this: Figure out all the final states and label each with the shortest string it accepts, work backwards from these states to...
Give a set notation definition of the language generated by the grammar S → aS | aA | a A → aAb | ab
Q1: Given the below language and context free gramma:, a. Show that the grammar is ambiguous using the string ( abc) by using substitutions. b. Then design a push down automata that recognizes the language. C. Then show the tracing of (abc, abbccc) using the push down automata. d. Then Show which two simple languages create the greaterlanguage. Give set builder notation for each language. e. Then produce Chomsky normal form for the grammar. The following context-free language is inherently...
Automata theory Q1: Assume S = {a, b}. Build a CFG for the language of all strings with a triple a in them. Give a regular expression for the same language. Convert the CFG into CNF grammar. Q2: Assume S = {a, b}. Build a CFG for the language defined by (aaa+b)*. Convert the CFG into CNF grammar. Q3: Explain when a CFG is ambiguous. Give an example of an ambiguous CFG. give vedio link also
Draw a dfa for a given language For Σ={a,b), draw a dfa that accepts the language. Clearly mark your start and final states. We were unable to transcribe this image
15. Give a simple description of the language generated by the grammar with productions SaaA, A -> bS 16. What language does the grammar with these productions generate? A ->B B- Aa
Give an unambiguous grammar for the same language generated by
the grammar:
<fruit>* : -<yellow» | <red> <yellow» banana |mango | <empty> <red> ::- cherry | apple | <empty> "Same language" means that the unambiguous grammar can generate exactly the same set of strings as the ambiguous grammar. No more; no fewer. There will of course be a difference in how - by what NTSs and productions - at least some of those strings are generated
* : -