Question

Complete the following

Tests of Within-Subjects Effects                          

source		type III sum of squares	df	mean squares	F	Sig.	Partial Eta Squared
Word Type	sphericity Assumed	99.556	1	99.556	39.911	.000	.399
	Greenhouse-geisser	99.556	1.000	99.556	39.911	.000	.399
	Huynh-Feldt	99.556	1.000	99.556	39.911	.000	.399
	Lower-bound	99.556	1.000	99.556	39.911	.000	.399
Word Processing	sphericity Assumed	18.778	2	9.389	3.764	.029	.111
	Greenhouse-geisser	18.778	2.000	9.389	3.764	.029	.111
	Huynh-Feldt	18.778	2.000	9.389	3.764	.029	.111
	Lower-bound	18.778	2.000	9.389	3.764	.029	.111
Error(wordtype)	sphericity Assumed	149.667	60	2.494
	Greenhouse-geisser	149.667	60.000	2.494
	Huynh-Feldt	149.667	60.000	2.494
	Lower-bound	149.667	60.000	2.494

1. Complete the following by filling in the appropriate values from the output (degrees of freedom, F-ratio, significance level, and partial eta squared). (From ‘Tests of Within-Subjects Effects.’ Use ‘Sphericity assumed,’)

Main effect of processing type, F( ___, ____) = ________, p = ______, partial eta squared _______ Main effect of word type, F( ___, ____) = ________, p = ______, partial eta squared _______ Processing Type x Word Type interaction, F( ___, ____) = ________, p = ______, partial eta squared _______

1. Which processing condition showed higher recall than the others? (based on pairwise comparisons)

2. Which word type showed higher recall? (based on pairwise comparisons)

3. Was the interaction effect significant? If so, what did it show? (This one, you need to wait for the instructor.)

Answer 1

Main effect of processing type, F( 1, 60) = 39.911 , p =0.000 , partial eta squared = 0.399

Main effect of word type, F(2,6) = 3.764 , p = 0.029, partial eta squared = 0.111

interaction and pairwise comparison is not provided