Question

ECS 3702

South Africa and Lesotho are two countries using capital (K) and labour (L) to produce cars and blankets. South Africa is a capital abundant country and Lesotho is a labour abundant country. The production of cars is capital intensive and blanket production is labour intensive. There is incomplete specialization in both countries.

 

Using the hypothetical scenario above, explain and show with the aid of a well-drawn diagram, that factor endowments determine comparative advantage and therefore that there are gains to be made from trade between the two countries.


0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Request Professional Answer

Request Answer!

We need at least 10 more requests to produce the answer.

0 / 10 have requested this problem solution

The more requests, the faster the answer.

Request! (Login Required)


All students who have requested the answer will be notified once they are available.
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
ECS 3702
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Consider the following information on factor endowments for the two countries of Spain and Germany. Answer...

    Consider the following information on factor endowments for the two countries of Spain and Germany. Answer the questions following the table on the discussion board. Answer each question separately by the number. Factor Endowments Spain Germany Labor Force 30 million 15 million Capital Stock 200,000 machines 400,000 machines Which country is relatively labor abundant? Show how you know. Which country is relatively capital abundant? Show how you determine. Assuming that steel is relatively capital intensive production, which country has a...

  • Assume a world of two goods, beef and cars; and two countries South Africa and Botswana....

    Assume a world of two goods, beef and cars; and two countries South Africa and Botswana. Cars are capital intensive and Botswana is labour abundant. Assume the standard H-O assumptions hold. According to the Rybczynski theory, if labour doubles in Botswana how does production and consumption compare to pre-growth conditions in Botswana? Explain with the relevant diagram. b. CMU is a country that produces apples and computers, where computers are capital intensive; CMU’s PPF is bowed out (exhibits increasing relative...

  • These questions are about international trade. I want to know the answers. 5 Heckscher-Ohlin Model. Suppose...

    These questions are about international trade. I want to know the answers. 5 Heckscher-Ohlin Model. Suppose the production of cloth is labour intensive and the production of food is land intensive and suppose the United States (US) is labour abundant and Canada is land abundant. (a) Show how the US production possibility frontier (PPF) differs from the Canadian PPF. Briefly explain. (Use the general version of the PPF's) (b) Which country will have the lower price of cloth Pc relative...

  • International trade, The standard model This is all information given for the question. The PPF has...

    International trade, The standard model This is all information given for the question. The PPF has to be drawn with help of the information that A is relatively capital-abundant and that productiok of X is relatively capital intensive. Chapter 6, The Standard Model 1. Countries A and B have two factors of production- labour and capital, which have some degree of substitutability. Country A is relatively capital-abundant. They each have the ability to produce two goodsX and Y. Production of...

  • PROBLEM 1 Consider the typical HO setting: 2 countries, the United States and Canada,  produce two goods,...

    PROBLEM 1 Consider the typical HO setting: 2 countries, the United States and Canada,  produce two goods, maiz (corn) and cloth, with two factors, land and labor. Both countries share the same tastes and the same technology. Maiz production is land intensive, and therefore cloth production is labor intensive. Furthermore, resource endowments are as follows: in the US there are 100 units of labor and 100 of land, in Canada there are 60 units of labor and 90 of land. Which...

  • Suppose there are two nations (A and B) which have the same technology, identical tastes but...

    Suppose there are two nations (A and B) which have the same technology, identical tastes but differing factor endowments, two commodities (X and Y) produced under increasing costs conditions, and no barriers to trade. Nation A is labour-abundant and Nation B is capital abundant. X is the labour-inten?ive good and Y is the capital-intensive good. Prove geometrically that mutually advantageous trade between the two nations is possible. Your answer should show the autarky and free-trade points of production and consumption...

  • 9. Problems and Applications Q9 Indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false....

    9. Problems and Applications Q9 Indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false. Statement True False 1. There can be no gains from trade between two countries if one of them has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods. 2. Comparative advantage determines the gains from specialization and trade. 3. If a certain trade is good for one country, it can't be good for the other country. 4. Two individuals can benefit from specialization and...

  • Indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false. Statement True False  Two countries can...

    Indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false. Statement True False  Two countries can gain from specialization and trade as long as they have different opportunity costs in the production of some goods.  The gains from specialization and trade are based on absolute advantage.  If a certain trade is good for one country, it must be good for the other country.  Two individuals can benefit from trade even if neither has a comparative advantage in some activity.  Workers in importing industries are...

  • 3. Gains from trade Consider two neighbouring island countries called Dolorium and Bellissima. They each have...

    3. Gains from trade Consider two neighbouring island countries called Dolorium and Bellissima. They each have 4 million labour hours available per week that they can use to produce corn, jeans, or a combination of both. The following table shows the amount of corn or jeans that can be produced using one hour of labour. Country Dolorium Corn (Bushels per hour of labour) 5 Jeans (Pairs per hour of labour) 20 Bellissima 8 16 Initially, suppose Bellissima uses 1 million...

  • 9. Comparative advantage is defined in terms of: efficiency. absolute advantage. opportunity cost. specialization. 10. David...

    9. Comparative advantage is defined in terms of: efficiency. absolute advantage. opportunity cost. specialization. 10. David can wash four cars in one hour or cut two lawns. Ralph can wash three cars in one hour or cut two lawns. David's opportunity cost for cutting one lawn is car washes, and Ralph's opportunity cost for cutting one lawn is car washes. a. 2; 1.5 4; 3.5 1.5; 2 d. 3.5; 4 11. Gains from trade are based on rather than: opportunity...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT