Question

Discuss which method of routing you would prefer, static routes or dynamic routes. Be sure to justify your choice. Consider extremely large networks that have thousands of routes. How does your preference change based on the scale of the network? At what point does static routing for all connected routes become unmanageable?

Answer 1

I would prefer Dynamic routing over static directing in light of the serious issue in static routing where if there should arise an occurrence of connection/hub disappointment the framework can't recuperate. The dynamic routing defeats from the static directing constraints.

Presently, considering  that your system comprises of 100 switches and you need to include just 2 new extraordinary subnets to the system in light of the fact that there is an opening of new office in your organization. You would need to include 200 static routing entries.So it is very clear as and as we scale up the network , dynamic routing can be the possible solution to manage the network else it will be manually not possible to create a routing table for such a large network.

The points where static routing for all connected routes become unmanageable are as follows:

• In the event that a connection falls flat, a static course can't reroute traffic.
• Vast system usage: When working with a system of 200 switches, the errand of refreshing one route can turn into a mind boggling undertaking, particularly in the event that you refresh the route in the wrong request. All things considered, you could lose access to a huge segment of the system until somebody visits that switch with a rollover link or interfaces from another zone of the system.