Compare the following 2 alternatives using the Net Present Worth (NPW) method – rate is 4.5% per year. Repeat the solution using the Net Equivalent Uniform Annual (NEUA) method. Which one is simpler? Draw all cash flow diagrams.
| Alt. | Construction Cost | Benefit | Maintenance | Service Life |
| A | $380,000 | $240,000/yr. | $10,000/yr. | 9 yrs |
| B | $750,000 | $270,000/yr. | $20,000/yr. | 18 yrs |
A. Net Present Worth (NPW) method
Present worth analysis will be carried out for 18 yrs (LCM of 9 & 18)
NPW of A = -380000 + (240000 - 10000)*(P/A, 4.5%,18) - 380000*(P/F, 4.5%,9)
= -380000 + 230000*12.159992 - 380000*0.672904
= 2161094.43
NPW of B = -750000 + (270000 - 20000)*(P/A, 4.5%,18)
= -750000 + 250000*12.159992
= 2289997.95
NPW of B is more, so it should be selected
B. Net Equivalent Uniform Annual (NEUA) method
EUAW of A = -380000*(A/P, 4.5%,9) + 240000 - 10000
= -380000*0.137574 + 230000
= 177721.70
EUAW of B = -750000*(A/P, 4.5%,18) + 270000 - 20000
= -750000*0.082237 + 250000
= 188322.32
As EUAW of B is more it should be selected
EUAW is simpler because it does not require LCM analysis and is useful in analyzing projects with unequal life periods
CFD
Alt A

Alt B

Compare the following 2 alternatives using the Net Present Worth (NPW) method – rate is 4.5%...
Compare the following 2 alternatives using the Net Present Worth (NPS) method – rate is 3% per year. Draw all cash flow diagrams. Please show work using a formula. Alt. Construction Cost ($) Benefit ($/yr.) Service Life (yrs.) A 380,000 200,000 7 B 450,000 220,000 7
Compare the following 2 alternatives using the Net Equivalent Uniform Annual (NEUA) method and the given interest rate of 4.5% Draw the Cash Flow Diagram Alt. Construction cost $ Benefit ($/yr) Salvage $ Service Life (yrs) A 1,800,000 400,000 40,000 7 B 2,900,000 550,000 80,000 14
6. Compre the following alternatives using the Net Equivalent Uniform Annual Worth method. Alt. Construction cost $ Life (yrs) A $30million 40 B $35million Infinite
The rate is 2.75%
5. Copmare the following 2 altrernatives using the Net Equivalent Uniform Annual method Alt. Construction cost $ Benefit ($/yr) Salvage $ Service Life (yrs) A 1,500,000 400,000 40,000 9 B 2,300,000 550,000 80,000 18
5. Compare the following two alternatives by the IRR method, given MARR of 8%/year. Is the incement in cost form A to B justified? Alt. Construction cost | Benefits Styr | Salvage Service Life (yrs 510,000 145,000 10,000 775,000 155,000 20,000
3. Compare the two following two alternatives using an equivalent worth method and a MARR of 12%. The repeatability assumption is acceptable. Aternative I: Initial investment of $45,000, net revenue the first year of $8,000, increasing $4,000 per year for the six year useful life. Salvage value is estimated to be $6500. Alternative II: Initial investment of $60,000, uniform annual revenue of $12,000 for the five year useful life. Slavage value is estimated to be $9,000.
Compare the two following alternatives in terms of present worth using MARRz 6% for a study period of 2 years Assume that the salvage value does not change depending on year sold. Alternative 1: First cost: 30,000 Yearly cost 6,000 Salvage value: 9,000 Lifetime: 4 Alternative 2 First cost: 75,000 Yearly cost 5,000 Salvage value: 13,000 Lifetime: 6 Alt 1: $-80,826, Alt 2: S-105,266 Alt 1: S-74,228, Alt 2: S-112,525 Alt 1 S-32,990, Alt 2: S-72,597 Alt 1: S-102,270, Alt...
Q1) Using AW method compare between
the following alternatives: (6 marks) Alt. F.C. Operating and Income at
the Annual S.V. Useful life i. maintenance nd end of 2 year Income А
35000 0 3500 2800 7000 8 8% B 32000 1500 4700 2500 0 8%
please help with question #12.24 without using
excel.
net present worth of this investment. Contributedby value, and Assume unit 444 CHAPTER 12: INCOME TAXES FOR CORPORATIONS Mukasa Ssemakula, Wayne State University (b) Explain why the rate of return obtained in part (a) is different from the rate of return obtained in Problem 12-20. 12-25 A firm has invested $400.000 in car- ment. They will depreciate the r-washing equip equipment by 6% (a) Comput (b) Comput MACRS G MACRS, assuming a...