Question

QUESTION 3. Read the following paragraphs on the subject of nuisance law, the fact situation that...

QUESTION 3. Read the following paragraphs on the subject of nuisance law, the fact situation that follows, and answer the bulleted questions:

The law of nuisance. This law imposes a duty upon landowners to prevent nuisances that could adversely affect the property of an adjoining owner. “Nuisance” is “a substantial interference with the right to use and enjoy the land,” and it is based upon the defendant’s activity or neglect. If a nuisance conflicts with another person’s “quiet enjoyment” of the use of the adjoining property, a cause of action lies including the right to seek an injunction ordering the end of the nuisance by removal, repair, rehabilitation or demolition. The burden of proof is on the party claiming the nuisance and damages can be assessed against the defendant if the plaintiff has been injured.

Fact situation. Arnold and Betty are neighbors. Betty’s lot is totally overgrown with trees, shrubs, flowering plants, and other vegetation. More than 20 mature tree branches overhang Arnold’s property, and dead branches have fallen into the yard, which required professional removal. Numerous shrubs and plants grow wild and have overrun portions of Arnolds’ property. Arnold has met with Betty to resolve this situation on at least ten occasions, especially during the past three growing seasons, but without success.

Arnold, extremely angry about this situation, brought an extension ladder, several saws and other equipment onto Betty’s property and cut down the trees with branches that had been overhanging his property. Betty called police, who arrested Arnold for trespass and other misdemeanors.

Questions:

  • Did Arnold have a right to enter Betty’s property for the purpose of cutting down the trees or trimming and removing the tree branches that extended over his property?
  • How should Arnold and/or Betty have resolved this problem?
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Arnold shouldn't have entered Betty's property at all because it's purely a trespassing act. He could have reported it to the police because it clearly comes under the nuisance class. On the other hand Arnold would have cut the branches that fell on his property from his own property without entering into Betty's property.


They both would have resolved this issue by mutually agreeing to cut the branches that reach Arnold's property. Good fences make good neighbors, so Betty could have understood that the branches of her trees fall in Arnold's property.

Thank you for your question. Please rate if you like the answer.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
QUESTION 3. Read the following paragraphs on the subject of nuisance law, the fact situation that...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are...

    Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT