Question

In the single-polluter case, suppose a firm faces an emission charge implemented as a marginal tax...

In the single-polluter case, suppose a firm faces an emission charge implemented as a marginal tax (MT) of 12 and that its MAC = 0.8A. Based on this information, the firm:

Select one:

a. is better off paying the tax at abatement levels below 15 units

b. is better off paying the tax as long as the abatement level is 1.5 units or less

c. should abate pollution for all abatement levels up to 15 units

d. should never pay the tax

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

c. should abate pollution for all abatement levels up to 15 units

(Optimal abatement level is that where MT = MAC
So, 12 = 0.8A
So, A = 12/0.8
So, A = 15

Thus, upto 15 units, pollution should be abated for all abatement levels.)

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
In the single-polluter case, suppose a firm faces an emission charge implemented as a marginal tax...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Suppose a firm’s marginal abatement function is given by MAC = 120 –2.5E, and it faces...

    Suppose a firm’s marginal abatement function is given by MAC = 120 –2.5E, and it faces a $110 per unit emissions tax. Suppose damages caused by this firm’s pollution is given by the function MD = 5E. a) To achieve social efficiency, how many units of emissions should the firm abate? b) What size per unit tax will give the firm an incentive to abate to the socially efficient level of emissions? c) If the firm abates to the socially...

  • 1. Consider an economy with a single firm and a single consumer. The firm marginal abatement...

    1. Consider an economy with a single firm and a single consumer. The firm marginal abatement costs of pollution x, MAC = 120 − .4x, and the consumer suffers marginal damages of pollution MD = .25x. a. If the firm has the right to pollute, what is the minimum amount of money it would accept from the consumer to abate 50 units of emissions? b. If the firm has the right to pollute, what is the maximum amount of money...

  • Depicted in the below figure 2. Firm 1 has marginal abatement cost "Firm 1 MAC 1" and Firm 2 has ...

    depicted in the below figure 2. Firm 1 has marginal abatement cost "Firm 1 MAC 1" and Firm 2 has marginal abatement cost "Firm 2 MAC 1" depicted in figure 1. The industry aggregate marginal abatement cost curve "Aggregate MAC 1 is given in figure 2. a. What is the optimal emissions tax? 0.5 points b. Given the optimal emissions tax what is the total cost of abatement and the total damages of pollution? 0.5 points] c. Suppose that Firm...

  • Question 3 Assume that there are two firms, each emitting 40 units of pollutants into the...

    Question 3 Assume that there are two firms, each emitting 40 units of pollutants into the environment, for a total of 80 units in their region. The government sets an aggregate abatement standard (AST) of 30 units (total in the region). The polluters' cost functions are as follows, where the dollar values are in thousands: Polluter 1: TAC1 = 15 + 1.5(A1)2, MAC1 = 3A1. Polluter 2: TAC2 = 16 + 0.55(A2)2, MAC2 = 1.1A2, a) What information does the...

  • Suppose there are two polluting sources in some region, and each generates 10 units of pollution....

    Suppose there are two polluting sources in some region, and each generates 10 units of pollution. The following equations describe each polluters total and marginal abatement costs: Polluter 1: TAC1 = 1.25(A1)2 , MAC1 = 2.5(A1) Polluter 2: TAC2 = 0.3125(A2)2 , MAC2= 0.625(A1) a. Suppose the total abatement level (A1 + A2) standard is set to 10 units of pollution. Find the cost-effective abatement levels to reach of this standard. b. If there is a uniform standard that each...

  • Suppose you have 2 polluting sources in a region. With the objective to mitigate pollution, the...

    Suppose you have 2 polluting sources in a region. With the objective to mitigate pollution, the government sets emissions limits as 10 units per company (Ast). As a market oriented policy, the government imposes an emission charge of $10 per unit (MT 10) of tax after MT MAC condition is met. The following functions are calculated for both polluters Polluter 1: MAC1 4.0(A1) Polluter 2: MAC2 2.4(A2) Total tax per pollutert(Ast - Ao) Where Ao Actual units abated The graphs...

  • Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1=12 -...

    Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1=12 - 2E1 MAC2 =10 - E2 Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 1/2 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint:...

  • Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1 =12−2E1MAC2...

    Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1 =12−2E1MAC2 =10−E2. Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 12 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint: This will be a...

  • ANSWER QUESTION 4 ONLY You work for the state environmental office and have been told that...

    ANSWER QUESTION 4 ONLY You work for the state environmental office and have been told that you are now in charge of determining the optimal amount of pollution allowed from powerplants in the area. You recognize that emissions from this powerplant causes damage to the environment, but that it is also costly to reduce the number of emissions due to reduced production of the plant. After doing some research you find that the Marginal Damage Cost (MDC) and Marginal Abatement...

  • Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs: MC1 = $24q1...

    Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs: MC1 = $24q1 MC2 = $12q2 where q1 and q2 are, respectively, tons of emissions reduced by the first and second firms. Total pollution-control cost functions for the two firms are: TC1 = $12 + $12(q1)2 TC2 = $10 + $6(q2)2 Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 10 tons of emissions (for aggregate emissions of 20 tons), and assume that there...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT