Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs:
MC1 = $24q1
MC2 = $12q2
where q1 and q2 are, respectively, tons of emissions reduced by the first and second firms. Total pollution-control cost functions for the two firms are:
TC1 = $12 + $12(q1)2
TC2 = $10 + $6(q2)2
Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 10 tons of emissions (for aggregate emissions of 20 tons), and assume that there are no significant transaction costs.
1. Assuming these are the only two firms in the industry, what are the total industry costs of pollution control if a uniform (quantity) emission standard is utilized to achieve an aggregate reduction (for both firms combined) of 4 tons of emissions?
2. What are the marginal costs of pollution control for firm #1 and for firm #2 under the uniform standard described in part a?
3. Compute the cost-effective allocation of control responsibility if a total reduction of 4 units of emissions is necessary, i.e. how many units of emissions will each firm reduce under a cost-effective allocation (assume tons are divisible)?
4. What are the total industry costs of pollution control (for both firms combined) with a cost-effective allocation of control responsibility?
5. Suppose firm #1 is freely allocated 7 tons of emissions permits and firm #2 is freely allocated 9 tons of emissions permits. If trading of permits is allowed, what will be the equilibrium allocation of permits? Assume permits are divisible. How will the equilibrium allocation be affected by a change in the initial allocation?
6. If the pollution control authority chose to reach its objective of 4 tons of aggregate reduction with an emission charge, what per-unit charge should be imposed? How much government revenue will the tax system generate, if the tax is levied on every unit of emissions?
7. Assuming the same target for aggregate emission reductions in each case, which policy instrument—taxes, tradeable permits, or a uniform standard—would you expect private industry to prefer? Why?
1. If uniform standard is followed, both firms will reduce 2 tons. So, q1=q2= 2 tons.
TC1 = 12 + 12*q1^2 = 12 + 12*2*2 = 60
TC2 = 10 + 6*q2^2 = 10 + 6*2*2 = 34
Total Industry Cost = 60+34 = 94
2. MC1 = 24*q1 = 24*2 = 48
MC2 = 12*q2 = 12*2 = 24
3. q1+q2 =4
TC = 22+ 12*q1^2 + 6*q2^2 = 22+ 12*q1^2 + 6*(4-q1)^2
= 22 + 12*q1^2 + 6*(16+q1^2 - 8*q1)
= 118 + 18*q1^2 - 48*q1
for cost effectiveness d(TC)/dq1 = 0
=> 36*q1 -48 = 0
=> q1 = 48/36 = 4/3
consequently, q2 = 4- q1 = 4-4/3 = 8/3
(q1,q2) = (4/3, 8/3)
4. Total Industry cost = 118+ 18*q1^2 -48*q1
= 118 + 18*16/9 - 48*4/3
= 118 + 32 - 64
= 118-32
= 86
Cost for Firm 1 = 12 + 12*q1^2 = 12+ 12* 4/3 * 4/3 = 12 + 21.34 = 33.34
Cost for Firm 2 = 10 + 6*q2^2 = 10 + 6* 8/3 * 8/3 = 10+42.67 = 52.67
Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs: MC1 = $24q1...
For questions (2) and (3) suppose the government imposes an emission standard on the firms requiring Firm 1 to reduce emissions by 30 tons and Firm 2 to reduce emissions by 20 tons. Question 2 10 pts Does the emission standard bring about a cost-effective allocation of pollution control responsibility? Yes NO Question 3 10 pts Calculate the total cost of pollution control for Firm 1 and for Firm 2. TCC1 - $ TCC2 = $ rvices Consider an industry...
Assume that a firm has the following marginal benefit of pollution (denoted E for emissions, measured in tons): MB=150-5E Q: How much would this firm pollute if pollution is unregulated? The government would like to reduce pollution from this amount by 12 tons and so implements a quantity constraint at the quantity in part (a) minus 12. What is the cost to this firm of reducing pollution by 12 tons? What tax would encourage this polluter to reduce pollution by...
13. The marginal benefit of being able to emit a ton of sulfur dioxide emissions for two firms are given by: MBx 200 (Ex /2) MBy-300-(Ey3) Note that these marginal benefit figures can be interpreted as marginal cost of abating emission down to levels Ex and Ey Government regulators want to reduce total sulfur dioxide emissions to a total of 1000 tons If the government imposes the same standard of 500 tons maximum emissions on both firms what would be...
Suppose two companies emit a particular pollutant. The marginal cost of reducing business pollution 1 is MC1 = 400q1 while the corresponding marginal cost for business 2 is MC2 = 100q2 (where 1 q and 2 q are the quantities of pollutant emissions that the first and second companies reduce, respectively) . Without government intervention, enterprise 1 generates 100 pollution units and enterprise 2 generates 80 pollution units. Cost effective allocation of pollution reduction requires that MC1=MC2 400q1=100q2 4q1=q2 Regulation...
Joulutet 3. Assume that a firm has the following marginal benefit of pollution (denoted E for emissions, measured in tons): MB=150-5 E e. Now assume that instead the government allocates each firm permits to pollute equal to the total current pollution minus 12 tons, but allows the firms to trade. Which firm will purchase permits and which firm will sell permits? Hint: Notice that total pollution reduction of firm 1 plus firm 2 will be 24 tons. f. How much...
3. The marginal control cost curves for two air pollutant sources are given by MCC 500q where qi and q2 denote controlled emissions by source 1 and 2, respectively. With no control, each firm would emit 5,000 units of the pollutant. If the objective is to reduce the total (combined) pollution emissions of the two firms down to 7,500 units. What would be the cost-effective level of pollution controlled by each firm? Find solution to the question raised a. algebraically...
In the following table are the marginal abatement costs of two firms. Note that an entry in the table indicates the cost of reducing emissions by one unit from the previous level. For example, $300 is the additional abatement cost for firm 1 to reduce its emissions from 3 tons to 2 tons, and $40 is the cost for firm 2 to reduce its emissions from 7 tons to 6 tons. Suppose that the Environmental Protection Agency wants to reduce...
Application 16.0 Cost-effective Gunk Control Two plants are emitting a uniformly mixed pollutant called gunk into the beautiful sky over Tourist-Town. The city government decides that it can tolerate total emissions of no more than 100 kgs of gunk per day. Plant G has marginal reduction costs of 100-4x, and is currently polluting at a level of 25, while plant K has marginal reduction costs of 150-y, and currently pollutes at a level of 150. (x and y are the...
Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1=12 - 2E1 MAC2 =10 - E2 Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 1/2 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint:...
Problem 2 This is the continuation of Problem 2 in Homework 3, but with questions about tradable permits. Two steel factories are currently emitting 8,000 tons of pollution each (for a total of 16,000 tons). Pollution reduction (abatement) costs for Plant 1 are given by MCR1= 0.02Q and for Plant 2 by MCR2 = 0.03Q, where Q represents tons of abatement, and MCR the marginal cost of pollution reduction. Suppose a tradable permit system is instituted in which permits for...