let us prove this by using an example
let the universal relation consists the all the positive integers.
U={1,2,3,4,5......n}
let Relation 1 R1={1,2,3,4,6}
Relation 2 R2={2,4,5}
we need to prove that union of relation is equivalent to the intersection of its complements.
I.e
R1 U R2= (R1c ∩ R2c)c
R1 U R2= set of all elements present in either R1 or R2
so, R1 U R2={1,2,3,4,5,6}
R1c= set all elements present in universal set except in R1
so R1c={5,7,8,9,10,.....n}
similarly R2c={1,3,6,7,8,9,10.....n}
R1c∩ R2c intersection gives the common elements in both the relations.
so R1c∩ R2c returns {7,8,9,10.....n}
now we need to find the (R1c∩ R2c )c is the intersection of its complements
(R1c∩ R2c )c = U - (R1c∩ R2c )
={1,2,3,4,5,6}
there fore it is proved that (R1 U R2) = (R1c∩ R2c )c
how would i prove that the union of a relation is equivalent to the intersection of...
Find the equivalent classes of the relation RL for the L defined in 1.46 part (a). Recall that for any language L, not necessarily a regular language, we defined the equivalence relation RL on Σ* as follows: xRLy iff ∀z ∈ Σ* , [xz ∈ L ⇐⇒ yz ∈ L]. 1.46) Prove that the following languages are not regular. You may use the pumping lemma and the closure of the class of regular languages under union, intersection, and complement. a....
For Language L1 and L2 prove or disprove (L1 union L2)*=L1* intersection L2*
Closure properties of P and NP. (a) Is P closed under union, intersection, concatenation, complement and star? Just answer ”yes” or ”no” for each operation. (b) Is NP closed under union, intersection, concatenation, complement and star? Just answer ”yes” or "no" for each operation.
Q1: Which of the following claims are true?* 1 point The recognizable languages are closed under union and intersection The decidable lanquages are closed under union and intersection The class of undecidable languages contains the class of recognizable anguages For every language A, at least one of A or A*c is recognizable Other: This is a required question Q2: Which of the following languages are recognizable? (Select all that apply) 1 point EDFA-{ «A> 1 A is a DFA and...
In relation algebra, the symbol ∩ is a. Union b. Set different c. Set intersection A recursive (role) relationship is a relationship between an entity and ________. a. subtype entity b. itself c. an archetype entity And (⊥), or (v) and not ( ) are called 1. set of attributes 2. set of comparison operators 3. set of connectives 4. set of constants Having the same number of attributes is called 1. unity 2. identity 3. compatibility 4. same arity ...
Please draw a venn diagram for A and B.
Exercise 3.7. Just as intersection and union have close algebrazc ties to multiplication and addition, the complement operation has close ties to the action of multiplying by1. For instance, just as (-1) (-1)a a for any number a, we have that A A for all sets A. Another more interesting way in which these operations are similar is the following: Recall that if a and b are numbers, then a<b In...
Prove the following language is not regular (you may use pumping lemma and the closure of the class of regular languages under union, intersection, and complement.): (w | w ∈ {0,1}* is not a palindrome} Please show work/explain. Thanks.
I have an optimization question if anyone's up for it,
thanks\
13. Prove that the intersection of a finite number of polyhedra in R" is a polyhedron in RT
1. (Non-regular languages) Prove that the following languages are not regular. You may use the pumping lemma and the closure of the class of regular languages under union, intersection, complement, and reverse (b) L2 = { w | w ∈ {0, 1}* is not a palindrome }. A palindrome is a string that reads the same forward and backward
3. Let E E Lm* (Lebesgue measurable set). Prove that there exist a set G (a countable intersection of open sets), and a set F (a countable union of closed sets) such that F CE C G and m* (F) the Lebesgue measure of a set Hint: The Lebesgue measure can be calculated in terms of open and closed sets m* (E) m* (G), where m* denotes
3. Let E E Lm* (Lebesgue measurable set). Prove that there exist a...