What would happen if the terminal mannose residue in the 1I3H stucture ligand were replaced with glucose? (assume D- glucose attached through the same linkage type). Do you predict ConA would bind to the modified ligand? Why or why not? Provide a structural arguement. HINT: Think about weak binding interactions.
yes,ConA can easily bind to non reducing terminal.concanavalin A (Con A) is the most celebrated and has proven to be one of the most useful of the plant lectins. Its physical chemical properties and carbohydrate-binding properties.The carbohydrate-binding specificity of Con A has been studied in great detail by every conceivable technique. It binds d-glucose, d-fructose, d-mannose, N-acetyl-d-glucosamine and related monosaccharides . The α-anomer of d-mannose is the monosaccharide most complementary to the Con A sugar binding site. The hydroxyl groups most critical for binding to the lectin are those at positions C-3, C-4 and C-6 of the d-pyranose ring system
What would happen if the terminal mannose residue in the 1I3H stucture ligand were replaced with...
1. According to the paper, what does lactate dehydrogenase
(LDH) do and what does it allow to happen within the myofiber? (5
points)
2. According to the paper, what is the major disadvantage of
relying on glycolysis during high-intensity exercise? (5
points)
3. Using Figure 1 in the paper, briefly describe the different
sources of ATP production at 50% versus 90% AND explain whether you
believe this depiction of ATP production applies to a Type IIX
myofiber in a human....