Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are
shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky,
and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project
with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value
will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions
choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not
cause value to be lost.
WACC: 8%
| Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| CFS | -$1,100 | $390 | $390 | $390 | $390 |
| CFL | -$2,200 | $735 | $735 | $735 | $735 |
|
$42.68 |
||
|
$40.12 |
||
|
$38.80 |
||
|
$36.44 |
||
|
$34.72 |
Answer : There will be loss of value of $ 42.68
Calculated as
Pay back period S = $1100/$390 = 2.82 yrs
Pay back period of Project L = $2200/735 = 2.99 years
So Project S will be selected it has shorter pay back period
Calculation of Loss in Value
| YEAR | CASH INFLOW | PV @ 10% | PRESENT VALUE |
| 1 TO 4 | $ 390 | 3.312100 | $ 1,291.72 |
| $ 1,291.72 | |||
| initial investment | $ (1,100.00) | ||
| npv | $ 191.72 | ||
| YEAR | CASH INFLOW | PV @ 10% | PRESENT VALUE |
| 1 TO 4 | $ 735 | 3.312100 | $ 2,434.39 |
| $ 2,434.39 | |||
| initial investment | $ (2,200.00) | ||
| npv | $ 234.39 | ||
| Loss in Value | = $191.72-$234.39 | = | $ (42.67) |
Hit Thumbs up if satisfied
Have any query mention in comment section please
Thank you
Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Question 8 of 24 Yonan Inc. is considering Projects Sand L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost. WACC: 10.25% 1 3 $500...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 10.75% 4 -$1,100 -$2,200 12 $375 $375 $725...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? WACC: 8% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,100 $380 $380 $380 $380 CFL -2,200 $730 $730 $730 $730 Options: 59.24, 52,83, 48,56, 43.70, 39.24
Question 20 1 pts Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost. WACC: 9.50% -$950 $500...
Sexton Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows
are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally
risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the
project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note
that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the
IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the
higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, so no value...
Carolina Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash
flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive,
equally risky, and are not repeatable. If the decision is made by
choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be
forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the
basis of the IRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. Identify also
the range of discounting rates in which project L will be
selected.
WACC: Year...
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? Note...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Question 3 of 24 Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the...
Carolina Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and are not repeatable. WACC: 7.75% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS −$1,050 $675 $650 CFL −$1,050 $360 $360 $360 $360 If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? What is the underlying...