A mathematician reported the results from a particular experiment to the researcher who conducted it. The report states that on one specific part of the experiment, a statistical test result yielded a p-value of 0.21. Based on this p-value, what should the researcher conclude?
A. The test was not statistically significant because 2 × 0.21 = 0.42, which is less than 0.5.
B.The test was statistically significant because a p-value of 0.21 is greater than a significance level of 0.05.
C. The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 79% of the time.
D.The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
E.The test was statistically significant because p = 1 − 0.21 = 0.79, which is greater than a significance level of 0.05.
Since p value = 0.21
Level of significance = 0.05
Since p value is greater than level of significance 0.05 so we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
So answer is
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
A mathematician reported the results from a particular experiment to the researcher who conducted it. The...
On a certain portion of an experiment, a statistical test result yielded a p-value of 0.21. What can you conclude? A. 2(0.21) = 0.42 < 0.5; the test is not statistically significant. B. If the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time, so the test is not statistically significant. C. 0.21 > 0.05; the test is statistically significant. D. If the null hypothesis is...
On a certain portion of an experiment, a statistical test result yielded a p-value of 0.15. What can you conclude? If the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 15% of the time, so the test is not statistically significant. 2(0.15) = 0.30 < 0.5; the test is not statistically significant. 0.15 > 0.05; the test is statistically significant. If the null hypothesis is true, one could expect...
PLEASE help ??
A researcher conducted a single sample t-test on results of an experiment with n = 18 participants and the computed t = -2.28. What is the correct conclusion from this experiment if p < 0.05, 2-tails test is used for hypothesis testing? O A. The researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis and concluded that there is a significant treatment effect. O B. The researcher rejected the null hypothesis and concluded that there is a significant treatment...
Trials in an experiment with a polygraph include 97 results that include 22 cases of wrong results and 75 cases of correct results. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that such polygraph results are correct less than 80% of the time. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method. Use the normal distribution as an approximation of the binomial...
Which of the following is an appropriate description of the significance level of a test? a.The proportion of the time we find a test statistic at least as extreme as the one we found in our study. b.The proportion of the time we expect that we'll fail to reject null hypotheses when we really should. c.The proportion of the time we expect the alternative hypothesis to be true. d.The proportion of the time we expect that we'll reject null hypotheses...
(6 points) For each problem, select the best response. (a) In testing hypotheses, which of the following would be strong evidence against the null hypothesis? A. Obtaining data with a large P-value. B. Using a small level of significance. C. Using a large level of significance. D. Obtaining data with a small P-value. (b) In formulating hypotheses for a statistical test of significance, the null hypothesis is often A. a statement of "no effect" or "no difference". B. the probability...
Suppose a researcher is testing the hypothesis Ho: p = 0.6 versus H1:p*0.6 and she finds the P-value to be 0.29. Explain what this means. Would she reject the null hypothesis? Why? Choose the correct explanation below. O A. If the P-value for a particular test statistic is 0.29, she expects results no more extreme than the test statistic in about 29 of 100 samples if the null hypothesis is true. OB. If the P-value for a particular test statistic...
Consider a multinomial experiment with n = 260 and k = 4. The null hypothesis to be tested is H0: p1 = p2 = p3 = p4 = 0.25. The observed frequencies resulting from the experiment are: (You may find it useful to reference the appropriate table: chi-square table or F table) Category 1 2 3 4 Frequency 73 44 75 68 a. Choose the appropriate alternative hypothesis. All population proportions differ from 0.25. Not all population proportions are equal...
To test Ho: u = 105 versus Hy: # 105 a simple random sample of size n= 35 is obtained. Complete parts a through e below. Click here to view the t-Distribution Area in Right Tail. (a) Does the population have to be normally distributed to test this hypothesis? Why? O A. No, because the test two-tailed OB. Yes, because n 2 30. OC. No, because n 2 30. OD. Yes, because the sample random (b) If x= 101.9 and...
A clinical trial was conducted using a new method designed to increase the probability of conceiving a boy. As of this writing, 304 babies were born to parents using the new method, and 245 of them were boys. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the new method is effective in increasing the likelihood that a baby will be a boy. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null hypothesis, and final...