Why are firms market caps so much higher if a firm’s NPV is negative?
At any point of time, the NPV of firm is the difference between the present value of its inflows and outflows. A positive NPV is indicator that the inflows are greater than outflows signifying profits and a positive growth prospects. A negative NPV signifies that the present value of outflows is greater than inflows and that there is a possible need for funds in future to keep the firm going.
The firms market value is the product of the price of the company issues shares and the number of shares outstanding. The number of outstanding shares is a generally less volatile as it depends on less frequent activities like IPO and buybacks etc. The volatile component is the price of stock which varies evry trading day at every second depending on the stock and market related parameters.
Thus if the NPV is negative, at this point the expected expenses of the firm is more than the income generated. This can be bad if the investors or the market perceives this firm to have less growth potential and thus the price of stock may decrease causing market capitalization to decrease. But I the investors and market expects the firm to do better and as having good growth potential, inspire of having a negative NPV, the price of stock can increase increasing the market capitalization.
Thus NPV and market capitalization are 2 different concepts which can move in the same or opposite manner depending ding on other parameters like growth potential of firm and markets perception.
Why are firms market caps so much higher if a firm’s NPV is negative?
Why would unions be more likely to obtain higher wages from monopolist firms (the firms are monopoly in the product market) than firms in a perfectly competitive product market?
Why is the insect diversity in streams so much higher than in lakes? Edit: I posted this question earlier, so my apologies for accidentally posting it again.
2.3 Initially, the market price was p = 20 , p=20, and the competitive firm’s minimum average variable cost was 18, while its minimum average cost was 21. Should it shut down? Why? Now this firm’s average variable cost increases by 3 at every quantity, while other firms in the market are unaffected. What happens to its average cost? Should this firm shut down? Why?
Consider the following information about a firm’s long-run total costs (assuming that other firms could produce at the same cost values): qA TC 0 0 100 2200 200 3600 300 5400 400 7600 500 10000 For each value of qA (except when qA = 0), provide the numerical value of the firm’s average total cost AC. Then, compare these AC values with the firm’s AVC (average variable cost) values at each value of qA. For any given level of qA,...
Market concentration Suppose that there are 10 firms in a market, and each of them has an equal market share. What is the value of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) in this market? Suppose instead that in this market one firm dominates such that it has a 90% market share, while the remaining nine firms each have an equal share of the remainder. What is the value of HHI in this case? (Hint! 10% of the market is divided among 9 firms, so each...
Why do you think Mexico’s Off-trade volume is so much higher, and growing faster than other Latin American countries?
Suppose that there are two firms operating in a market. Suppose that the degree of operating leverage for Firm 1 is DOL= 1.5 while the degree of operating leverage for Firm 2 is DOL=2 How much would the profits of each firm change if both firms experienced an increase in quantity sold of 10%? Suppose instead that each firm experiences a 5% decrease in quantity sold. What would happen to the profits of each firm? Which firm’s profits are more sensitive to...
Why might some firms voluntarily pay workers a wage
above the market equilibrium, even in the presence of surplus
labor? Check all that apply.
Higher wages cause workers to shirk more of their
responsibilities.
Paying higher wages tends to reduce the average
experience level of a firm's workers.
Paying higher wages encourages workers to be more
productive.
Higher wages attract a more competent pool of
workers.
Attempts: Average: 1 7. The theory of efficiency wages Why might some firms voluntarily...
Explain why, in a market with negative externality, too much output (more than the efficient amount) is produced and sold and positive externality, too little output (less than the efficient amount) is produced and sold. If you use a diagram in your answer, make that diagram large and label all axes, curves, and points.
Explain why, in a market with negative externality, too much output (more than the efficient amount) is produced and sold and positive externality, too little output (less than the efficient amount) is produced and sold. If you use a diagram in your answer, make that diagram large and label all axes, curves, and points.