Question

Critically analyze the following three popular training systems: bigger, faster, stronger (BFS); crossfit; and high intensity training/heavy duty training (HIT). How do they compare to the seven laws of training? Which of these systems of training would be most appropriate for you? Why?

Answer 1

There is a problem that persists among pundits for each of the listed systems with how these training principles are employed, whether they should be employed at all. When does a training system which follows one rule, but is the violation of another become so important that it becomes viable in violation of other? To answer this as an example that would clarify the matter more simplified. Why bother squatting for greater performance capabilities in the shot-put? Secondly, Muscles cannot tell the difference between sources of overload stimulus, or explosive lifting power,

Some good training guidelines have been developed over the years. All this needs to compare the basic tenets underpinning some of the alleged systems and lifting techniques mentioned in order to determine whether the laws are being adhered to. They can not imply in every instance, which makes them on a scale of good, better, best but only good.

To learn the proper exercise techniques, as well as multiple variations and safety protocols, one needs to find recommendations for integrating new equipment, athlete monitoring systems, and other technology into the program to ensure maximum effectiveness and performance gains. This can accommodate any sport and every level of competition. Safe, effective, and relied on by thousands of athletes, coaches, and administrators, it is the proven performance program you can trust.

CrossFit is a fitness regimen developed over several decades. It has created a program specifically designed to improve fitness and health. It is constantly varied functional movements performed at high intensity.

This combines strength training, speed training, Olympic and power style weight lifting, kettle bells, body weight exercises, gymnastics, and endurance exercise. The main exercises involve the whole body and include pushing, pulling, running, rowing, and squatting. This is a high intensity exercise program that focuses on performing a variety of strength and aerobic exercises, ranging from push ups to sprints and clean and jerks. The training focuses on performing quality weight training repetitions to the point of momentary muscular failure. The training takes into account the number of repetitions, the amount of weight, and the amount of time the muscle is exposed in order to maximize the amount of muscle fiber recruitment. The fundamental principles of high intensity training are that exercise should be brief, and intense. Exercises are performed with a high level of effort, or intensity, where it is thought that it will stimulate the body to produce an increase in muscular strength and size. It advocates the believe that this method is superior for strength and size building to most other methods which, for example, may stress lower weights with larger volume.

All the techniques available these days are frying one's brain. These techniques are known as hyper choice which results that more and more are opting for the one that's presented with the greatest sizzle instead of scrutinizing each relative to personal needs and objectives.

If one has time to peruse them, and adequate knowledge of training science to make choice, uncertainty as to which is best will paralyze you, there's no way one will be able to make an informed choice. Some work best for strength, cuts, speed, sports, fitness, hard gainers, beginners. So, the right up front objective is, it's to help the cut through all the hype, bombast and nonsense. How to cut the chase and how to discern what's going to be best by using a short checklist of relevant questions.

Science, when all's said and done, there's really only one science. Those who would interpret this one science should better be prepared to defend their interpretation. Science is misinterpreted by those not well versed in it. Readers of tripe aren't well versed in the science either, wherein lay’s the problem.

It’s a belief that some need for recognition beyond their station, or perhaps from mere unbridled ego. It augers well, for maintained interest in the game. In general recognizing that many of the systems and techniques have varying measures of merit, their efforts are cute, but it doesn't cut it in the world of a peak performing athlete. The ever growing series of training systems and techniques incorporated in the arranged system that has preached in all the magazines, add to that the myriad sport specific systems out there have nothing short of physical if not mental and emotional gridlock.

Being an iron head through and through, it endeavored to discern the elemental workings of each system and training technique. It is used as the old Benjamin Franklin trick of making a two sided checklist to compare the pros and cons of each other, which simplifies the matter. .

There are some rather well documented training principle laws, really that are of overriding importance in whatever system one follows. There are various overlapping principles upon which all systems must rely if maximum effectiveness in training outcomes are to be expected. The most training systems currently popular for the muscle that adhere are implied to the various laws. What determines whether a training system is more or less effective than another lies both in these laws that are implemented how they are used to the best advantage of the trainee and whether they are even considered at all.

There are many of the important principles of strength training. In addition to the ones listed, they talk about another principle, which posits that all patterned activity and computerized instructions to the nervous systems comes from the highest command and integrating center in humans. Many fitness professionals focus on training the muscles as if they are an independent entity.

There is a principle in which the physiological adaptations of training are maintained with a reduction in the training volume and frequency. The overall reduction allows the body adequate rest to perform maximally. There appears to be a fine balance between the amount of rest and the amount of exercise performed. Swimmers typically have been the biggest proponents of tapering. However, the literature has a number of published studies that include runners, cyclists. This list is not complete, by any means but they are implied that come to mind has also done a lot of work.
If the training load is specific to the desired outcome, and progresses, the organism eventually accommodates to the stress. Various studies, in the trenches observations show that varying various aspects of the training load tend to allow the athlete to make more progress before accommodation sets in.

However, it seems that this is the part of the precepts outlined in the Overload Principle, wherein it's said that one must constantly add greater stress than that can accommodate. This could mean changing the nature of the stress, and not just the amount.

There are many differing points of view when it comes to training principles. As informed of his belief that in most reference sources there are listed only three training principles: Overload, Specificity and Reversibility. Everything else seems to be concepts that can be subordinated to them, and no matter how important these concepts are, should not be called as principles.

And, finally, the preached Principle of accommodation is important to athletes in particular. As you train hard, and your body adapts by getting bigger, faster or stronger, you essentially become a different person and your abilities, timing and so forth all change. So, in order to maintain skills, timing, flexibility and other sports attributes, it is wise to practice those skills such that you are adjusting your skills to fit your new body.