Let, R=(A,B,C,D,E,G) and let F be {A→BDG, BG→DE, B→D, D→A}. Argue that R is not in BCNF by finding one functional dependency in F that violates the definition of BCNF. Add one more non-trivial dependency to F so that R is in BCNF with respect to the new set of dependencies.
The decomposition is lossless.
Explanation:
Lossless Join Decomposition:
The decomposition of a table or relation in DBMS is done to normalize the date if the table or relation is not following the rule of a normal form. We decompose the table into two or more tables if it preserves the dependency and lossless join.
By using a lossless join decomposition method we remove the redundancy from the database and the original data is preserved as it is.
If we can reconstruct a table from the decomposed tables using joins and join results in the same original table, then decomposition is lossless otherwise decomposition is lossy.
We can use three methods, to check the decomposition is lossless or lossy:
The given relation is:
R = (A, B, C) is decomposed into
R1= (A, B) and
R2 = (B, C)
The given functional dependency is given below:
B → C
The decomposition is lossless because there is one column that is common.
The dependency will preserve because the functional dependency will remain in the second table.
Let, R=(A,B,C,D,E,G) and let F be {A→BDG, BG→DE, B→D, D→A}. Argue that R is not in...
5c. Consider the relation R(ABCDE) with the set of functional dependencies F={BE→D, DE→A, AD→C, B→E}. Using decomposition, find a lossless, dependency preserving, BCNF set of relations for R, if such exists. Be sure to identify the projections of the functional dependencies onto the resulting relations at each stage of the decomposition.
Assume that R(A, B, C, D, E, F) has been decomposed into S(A, C, E, F) and other relations. If the dependencies for R are: AB rightarrow C, C rightarrow E, E rightarrow D, D rightarrow F, F rightarrow D. (a) Find ALL non-trivial functional dependencies that hold in S (b) Determine the keys and superkeys of S (c) For each one of your functional dependencies from part a) indicate if it is a BCNF violation, a 3NF violation or...
Given R = (A, B, C, D, E, G, H, I) and the set F of functional dependencies: BDEI → GH EG → AI DH → CE I → BD use the BCNF algorithm to generate a database design. Is your design dependency-preserving? Why or why not?
Language: SQL - Normalization and Functional
Dependencies
Part 4 Normalization and Functional Dependencies Consider the following relation R(A, B, C, D)and functional dependencies F that hold over this relation. F=D → C, A B,A-C Question 4.1 (3 Points) Determine all candidate keys of R Question 4.2 (4 Points) Compute the attribute cover of X-(C, B) according to F Question 43 (5 Points) Compute the canonical cover of F.Show each step of the generation according to the algorithm shown in class....
Consider the schema R=(A, B, C, D, E) and let the following set F of functional dependencies hold for R: F= {A → BC, CD → E, B D } Problem 3 Suppose that the schema R=(A, B, C, D, E) is decomposed into R/ - (A, B, C) and R=(A, D, E). Show if this decomposition is a lossless decomposition with respect to the given set of functional dependencies F.
Table T1(A, B, C, D, E) functional dependencies: A -> B AC -> DE D -> C List candidate key(s), and how you found the key(s). Which functional dependency causes BCNF violation? Decompose T1 into BCNF tables. Please show all work here.
Q3: Given a relational schema R = {A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,1,J,K} and a set of functional dependencies F {A B C D E, E F G H I J,AI →K} and a key(R) = AI = 1. Is R in BCNF? If yes, justify your answer [5 points] 2. If no, explain why and decompose R for two levels only [10 points] 3. Check whether the decomposition in step 2 dependency preserved or not [5 points]
Let R(A,B,C,D,E) be a relation with FDs F = {AB-CD, A-E, C-D, DE} The decomposition of R into R1(A, B, C), R2(B, C, D) and R3(C, D, E) is (2 Points) Select one: Lossy and Dependency Preserving. Lossless and Not Dependency Preserving. Lossy and Not Dependency Preserving. Lossless and Dependency Preserving.
Here's a relation (R), its attributes and its functional dependencies (F): R(A, B, C, D, E) C D → B A → D D → C E → C What is the closure of AB ({AB}+)? What is the closure of F (F+)? [ set of closures for all LHS][each LHS on one line] What is the minimal set (cover) for F? Provide a key for relation R (a minimal set of attributes that can determine all attr.) Decompose the...
1. Given the schema R(A,B,C,D,E) with the functional
dependencies
F = { A → C,D D B, E B, C + D, E E → B,C } Is this schema in BCNF? If it is, prove it. If not, find a BCNF decomposition and then prove that the decomposition is in BCNF. You must prove each step carefully.