Question

1. Which of the following is NOT an element of the tort of intentional interference with contractual relations?

A. There was injury to the plaintiff.

B. There was a contract between the plaintiff and a third party.

C. Defendant improperly induced the third party to breach the contract or made performance of the contract impossible.

D. Defendant knew of the contract.

E. Defendant received a benefit from the contract

2. In torts, proximate cause is:

A. foreseeable and not too remote

B. negligence

C. actual cause

D. causation in fact

3. The doctrine wherein an employer is responsible for the negligence of his employees if they were acting in the scope of employment is called ___________________.

A. vicarious liability

B. strict liability

C. proximate cause

D. circumstantial evidence

Answer 1

1. Which of the following is NOT an element of the tort of intentional interference with contractual relations?

E. Defendant received a benefit from the contract

To influence the claim, the plaintiff must demonstrate four elements

(1)   that a substantial agreement existed, (2 Knowledge of that relationship by an outsider. (3) that the defendant acted purposefully and inappropriately, and (4) that the plaintiff was harmed by the defendant's actions

2. In torts, proximate cause is:

A. foreseeable and not too remote

Proximate cause signifies "lawful cause," or one that the law perceives as the essential driver of the injury. It may not be the main occasion that set moving a grouping of occasions that prompted an injury, and it may not be the absolute last occasion before the injury happens. Rather, it is an action that created foreseeable outcomes without mediation from any other person. At the end of the day, the plaintiff should show that the wounds were the normal and direct result of the proximate cause, without which the wounds would not have happened.

3. The doctrine wherein an employer is responsible for the negligence of his employees if they were acting in the scope of employment is called ___________________

A. vicarious liability

An employer might be at risk for a mishap caused by an employee as the aftereffect of the negligent acts of a conveyance vehicle. Regularly, guardians might be held vicariously subject for the negligent demonstrations of their kids.

Vicarious liability can be built up where an obligation of care forced on an employer has been broken, yet the inquirer can't distinguish which employee ruptured it.

Please leave a thumbsup