Question

Humans have been making decisions throughout history. The methods that we have used historically to make decisions are now being replaced, in some cases, with more advanced decision-making methods. Is this a positive change? Think of an example where a more advanced method produces a positive or negative result.

Considering this please address the following prompts in your discussion:

1. Is this a positive change? Why or why not?
2. Describe an example where a more advanced method produces a positive or negative result. Why is this?

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Answer 1

1. It is a positive change. As times have progressed, humans have acquired a more balanced and complete sense of morality and values which in hand has brought more comprehension and understanding when taking decisions.
2. One example is Monarchy vs Democracy. As times have changed monarchies have crumbled down since the people have realised whoever leads a country must be a person which reflects the values, goals and listens to the people he/she governs. This is a positive change since with this system the people have a say in who leads and represents them and also gives every individuals' voice, power.

Please rate