Question

can please someone help me with this assignment

Phillip is an editor at a newspaper. His newspaper has published a report on a national study, which concluded that bottled water has virtually no health advantages over the tap water in most cities, including the location of the newspaper. The story included comments from local health storeowners and water distributors challenging the study. The AquaPure Bottled Water Company has an advertising account worth over $75,000/year with the newspaper. AquaPure has threatened to pull its account with the newspaper unless Phillip run another story of equal prominence, focusing on the benefits of bottled water. This is one of the most lucrative advertising accounts the paper has, and the paper would struggle without it. Should Phillip run the story AquaPure is demanding, or not? Fully explore both sides of the issue before coming to a conclusion.

Guidelines: ¾-1 page single spaced, using Times New Roman 12 pt font (350-500 words) You can make realistic assumptions, but cannot add or create details. Use your own words - do not copy large parts of the question. Make sure to use appropriate grammar to clearly express your ideas.

This is an essay, so write it in the third person. Format: Introduction: A brief summary of the issue at hand. Do not include your thesis/opinion Analysis of side A Analysis of side B Optional analysis: Possibly an alternative to A and B Conclusion: your position and why you support it. This is where you can discuss pitfalls of the side you are NOT choosing.

Answer 1

Now a days the R.O water is dangerous to health because this tap water and R.O water are demineralized water. In recent days many people are suffering with mineral deficiency diseases.The bottled water contains all minerals and vitamins which are not fully purified and with all minerals.so bottled water is more useful than local water.For local water no specific care is not taking for pure water.So now a days bottled water are more useful than local water.